The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Intersection · Compounds × research use only

Compounds topics tagged research use only

Topics in Compounds carrying the tag research use only. Material not approved for human use, sold for laboratory research.

20 topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why — does this still hold?
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Putting the numbers in the first post,…
TGAVGDAT+3 7 26k 7h
AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited — does this still hold?
The question in the title: AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. What changes if the standard account of…
NLKKNRPFI+7 11 31k 19h
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about research-use-only status directly, because I…
KFKLVSHVAF+72 81 44k 1d
Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything
Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. What changes if the standard account of catalogue breadth is wrong?…
CBKAV 2 38k 2d
Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause Everything below is what sits behind that. I was wrong about naming conventions for research…
ATNFPNDA+21 25 4.9k 22d
Coming back to: Reading a supplier's product description as a marketing document
Reading a supplier's product description as a marketing document Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Documentation question rather than a pharmacological one,…
HBELCVHNDN+35 39 688 5mo
AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited
Posting this under the heading it deserves: AOD-9604 and the fragment hypothesis, revisited Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading back through what has been written here about AOD-9604, three…
ARCDJBMRBR+40 44 2.8k 6mo
About the Other compounds category
Anything not covered by a dedicated subcategory, including research-use-only material with no human data. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…
KJMMYSDK+8 12 51k 7mo
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — does this still hold? Asking about Research-use-only status directly, because I…
DBETRT 2 309 9mo
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why
Compounds this community declines to help with, and why — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Putting the numbers in the first post, because a question about a compound without…
MKJSMSRFF+81 87 35k 10mo
Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything — what changed since
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why catalogue breadth is not evidence of anything — what changed since What changes if the standard account of catalogue breadth is wrong? I ask…
NEHFDBBKLG+62 66 26k 10mo
Coming back to: When "no data" is the complete and final answer
When "no data" is the complete and final answer I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Asking about the compound itself rather than about a trial of it. I…
LVAVHAPNV+77 82 12k 11mo
How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself Question about what the published evidence for this compound actually…
FNSRMFSTRH+107 119 11k 12mo
Sequence verification for an obscure compound: how it is done
Sequence verification for an obscure compound: how it is done Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about sequence verification directly, because I have…
BNGVIAJVGE+104 114 10k 12mo
Second pass at: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself
Second pass at: How to research a compound with no human data without deceiving yourself Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. The question about research a…
SVKBISCGP+64 71 2.5k 13mo
When "no data" is the complete and final answer
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: When "no data" is the complete and final answer Asking about the compound itself rather than about a trial of it. I have read the maintained page…
NPNTPOSPNS+154 165 6.3k 15mo
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — a second dataset
Research-use-only status: what it means legally and practically — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting a small dataset on Research-use-only status. It…
TWONMSRFF+109 125 2k 16mo
Revisiting: Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile Everything below is what sits behind that. Melanocortin agonists, from the point of…
NATKBANDB+119 141 22k 20mo
Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile
Melanocortin agonists: mechanism and the documented adverse profile — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Melanocortin agonists, and specifically the version of it that the…
APAWCEBWGR+7 11 5.5k 20mo
Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause — one year on
Naming conventions for research peptides and the confusion they cause — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about Naming conventions for research peptides…
CPLCVSMSCV+1 5 181 2y