The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Practical reference · maintained document

TB-500 — reference

Maintainers: PSkarbek, ppm_error, mira.patel Last updated 25 April 2026 Next review due 3 October 2026 523 words · 5 revisions
Sourced from a discussion. This document was promoted out of BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not, in Repair & healing peptides. That topic links back here, and corrections raised there flow into this page.

TB-500: thymosin beta-4 fragment (research use only), approximate mass 889.0 Da (the commonly sold 7-residue fragment), Not well characterised in humans half-life. Identity, evidence base, analytical considerations and limitations.

Scope

A maintained identity and evidence reference for TB-500. It is deliberately narrow: what the molecule is, what has been published about it, and what an analytical report on it can and cannot establish. It contains no dosing recommendations and is not advice about anyone's care.

Where a figure is approximate this page says so. Where something is unknown, it says that instead of filling the gap.

Identity

FieldValue
ClassThymosin beta-4 fragment (research use only)
Approximate molecular mass≈ 889.0 Da (the commonly sold 7-residue fragment)
Molecular formulaC37H61N9O14
Elimination half-lifeNot well characterised in humans
Route and scheduleInjection in preclinical work
Regulatory statusResearch use only. Not approved for human use

Masses quoted here are approximate and are given for orientation when reading an analytical report. For a mass-error calculation, use the exact monoisotopic mass computed from the elemental composition rather than a rounded figure from a reference page, including this one.

What it is

The material sold as TB-500 is usually a short actin-binding fragment of thymosin beta-4 rather than the full 43-residue protein. The two are routinely conflated, including in supplier documentation, and the preclinical literature mostly concerns the full protein.

That conflation is the most important thing to understand about this compound. Evidence about thymosin beta-4 is not automatically evidence about a seven-residue fragment of it.

Evidence base

Published studies and programmes most relevant to this compound:

  • No adequately powered, published, randomised controlled human trials known to us

As with BPC-157, identity is analytically easy and efficacy is unestablished in humans.

Individual digests for several of these are maintained separately in this commons and are linked from the evidence category. A digest is a summary with its criticisms attached; it is not a substitute for reading the paper.

Analytical considerations

The usual analytical approach depends on whether the molecule is a peptide; where it is not, peptide conventions do not transfer. A purity figure is an area percentage at a stated wavelength under a stated gradient, and it is not interchangeable with a content determination.

Three things a purity assay on this compound will not tell you: how much peptide is in the container (that requires a content assay), what the counter-ion is (that requires ion chromatography or NMR), and whether anything is present that does not elute under the method used.

See Reversed-phase HPLC for peptides and LC-MS identity confirmation for the method detail.

Status and legality

Research use only. Not approved for human use.

Material sold as research-use-only is not a licensed medicine, whatever it contains and however good its certificate is. That is a statement about regulatory status rather than about quality, and it is true of high-purity material as much as of poor material.

Limitations of this page

This is a reference page maintained by volunteers, reviewed on the date shown, and it will be out of date at some point after that date. It summarises published work rather than reproducing it, and a summary always loses something. Where the summary and the source disagree, the source is right.

If you find an error, the fastest route to fixing it is a topic in doc review naming the sentence and the source. The maintainers named above are notified.

Revision history

2026-04-25KTurkingtonPlain-language pass on the opening section after feedback from a newcomer.
2026-01-15sourced_claimsRecorded a dissent from one maintainer rather than resolving it silently.
2025-12-01r.venkatesanAdded cross-references to the two topics that most often ask this question.
2025-07-10hana.satoCitation sweep: two references did not support the sentences attached to them and have been replaced.
2025-03-17formulary_notesInitial promotion from the source topic. Structure taken from the marked solution.

Every edit to a maintained document records its author and a note explaining the change. An edit without a note may be reverted by any wiki editor under R9, and the revert is logged. Disagreements about content belong on the source topic rather than in the revision history (R10).

Related documents

  • BPC-157 — referenceBPC-157: synthetic pentadecapeptide (research use only), approximate mass 1419.5 Da, Short; not well characterised in…