Revision disputes: if you disagree with an edit a maintainer made, discussing it here invites resolution rather than conflict.
13 likes 15mo
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Revision disputes: if you disagree with an edit a maintainer made, discussing it here invites resolution rather than conflict.
Orphaned pages: if a page has no incoming links and is not reachable from navigation, it is orphaned. Such pages should either be linked or deprecated.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[2026 update] Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed
Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the…
|
+41 | 45 | 47k | 12mo |
|
An orphaned page with no inbound links
An orphaned page with no inbound links — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps…
|
+44 | 48 | 7.5k | 14mo |
|
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have…
|
+45 | 50 | 33k | 20mo |
|
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
|
+11 | 15 | 40k | 16h |
|
[2026 update] Reverting an edit that had no revision note
Reverting an edit that had no revision note — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level…
|
+8 | 12 | 54k | 12mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Follow-up: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked?
The question in the title: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Nominating something for promotion into the…
|
2 | 64k | 16mo | |
|
Mobile reading experience on long topics
Mobile reading experience on long topics Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…
|
2 | 14k | 4h | |
|
Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding
Why we hide unevidenced fraud accusations and log the hiding — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a…
|
+97 | 106 | 63k | 14mo |
|
An orphaned page with no inbound links
An orphaned page with no inbound links — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps…
|
+44 | 48 | 7.5k | 14mo |
|
Coming back to: When a red flag was a misunderstanding, and the retraction
When a red flag was a misunderstanding, and the retraction I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually…
|
+6 | 10 | 257 | 21h |