The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Meta · Wiki maintenance · continued

Pages past their review date, listed posts 31–31

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

JI
j.iyerTL2 Moderator14 Sep 2025#31
Ibrahimovi, post #17: Revision disputes: if you disagree with an edit a maintainer made, discussing it here invites resolution rather than conflict. Go to post

Authority: if you think a page needs input from someone with specific expertise, suggesting that person helps the maintainer recruit contributors.

6 likes in reply to #17 10mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
[2026 update] Reverting an edit that had no revision note
Reverting an edit that had no revision note — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level…
NRSMPWAVBN+8 12 54k 12mo
[2026 update] Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed
Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the…
ATPPMVNGMO+41 45 47k 12mo
Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold? Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in…
GPAINRLDEF+49 56 39k 11d
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have…
FPIGRIDLA+45 50 33k 20mo
Reverting an edit that had no revision note
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reverting an edit that had no revision note Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic…
GPAVDAMN+17 21 4.5k 12mo

Related topics — sharing the tags wiki post, maintainership, review date

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Guidelines revision: what changed and why — does this still hold?
Guidelines revision: what changed and why — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Process question about how this site works. I have…
QZJCTS 2 58k 7mo
Guidelines revision: what changed and why
Guidelines revision: what changed and why Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the…
MPTTAHECKH+127 142 1.7k 2y
[2026 update] Splitting an overlong document into two
Splitting an overlong document into two — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps…
NGANABANLG+44 48 7k 9mo
Revisiting: Maintainer handover: how it works
Revisiting: Maintainer handover: how it works Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the…
SCNITPESUC+53 57 664 4mo
Scheduled maintenance and what will be unavailable
Scheduled maintenance and what will be unavailable Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The…
KBVNKFKIC+121 128 25k 15mo