Worth separating two things that post #16 runs together.
Dose hold versus tapering: if a temporary shortage forces a gap, holding your dose and resuming when supply returns is different from gradually tapering. The two are different decisions.
Worth separating two things that post #16 runs together.
Dose hold versus tapering: if a temporary shortage forces a gap, holding your dose and resuming when supply returns is different from gradually tapering. The two are different decisions.
Supply interruptions: official shortage notices are published by regulatory agencies. That is the correct primary source rather than pharmacy rumors or forum discussion.
Communication from suppliers: a supplier having supply problems usually communicates them. If a supplier goes silent, that is itself information.
Coming back to post #74, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Resuming after a gap: after a gap of days or a few weeks, most people resume at the dose they were on when they stopped. Gaps of months might require retitration discussion with a clinician.
Resuming after a gap: after a gap of days or a few weeks, most people resume at the dose they were on when they stopped. Gaps of months might require retitration discussion with a clinician.
On post #106 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Worth separating two things that post #109 runs together.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
This follows post #126 rather than contradicting it.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Read the full topic (134 posts)
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Managing an unplanned gap in supply — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Managing an unplanned gap in supply — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
+114 | 124 | 54k | 8mo |
|
Substitution between formats during a shortage
On the subject in the title: Substitution between formats during a shortage Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category expires. As of…
|
+114 | 123 | 47k | 7mo |
|
How shortages have affected compounding permissions
How shortages have affected compounding permissions I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that…
|
+61 | 71 | 3.6k | 2d |
|
Substitution between formats during a shortage — what changed since
Substitution between formats during a shortage — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…
|
+17 | 21 | 2.7k | 9d |
|
Managing an unplanned gap in supply
Managing an unplanned gap in supply — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what determines the answer.…
|
+105 | 110 | 5.1k | 3mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
How shortages have affected compounding permissions — does this still hold?
How shortages have affected compounding permissions — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A coverage question with the paperwork…
|
+27 | 31 | 21k | 17h |
|
Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Research-use-only labelling: what it means and what it does not — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to talk about…
|
+150 | 158 | 55k | 14mo |
|
Tracking a shortage from primary sources rather than rumour — the long version
On the subject in the title: Tracking a shortage from primary sources rather than rumour — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in…
|
2 | 60 | 1d | |
|
Labelling requirements for research chemicals — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Labelling requirements for research chemicals — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a…
|
2 | 1.8k | 2mo | |
|
About the Pricing category
List prices, negotiated prices, and cost per milligram compared honestly across formats. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
+1 | 5 | 18k | 15mo |