Trust level 3 requirements: a clarification

Trust level 3 requirements: a clarification — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

Trust level 3 requirements, and specifically the version of it that the documentation does not cover. The maintained page handles the general case well and stops exactly where my question starts.

Setting out the gap in case it is a gap in the page rather than a gap in what is known.

This follows the opening post rather than contradicting it.

Thank you for announcing it in advance rather than after. The number of places that do the reverse is remarkable.

Somebody will have a better source than mine, and I hope they post it.

Picking up post #4: that is the part I would want checked first.

Practical note on trust level 3 requirements: write down what you expect before you look. The number of times I have found what I went looking for is higher than chance would allow.

The rare case here is the one that costs somebody a week, though, and the common case costs everyone ten seconds. I think the trade is clearly correct.

Worth separating two things that post #10 runs together.

What I would want before treating trust level 3 requirements as settled: the method, the sample, and whether anyone tried to find the opposite result. Two of the three are usually missing.