Tags · Sourcing
batch & lot numbers
The identifier that makes any of this traceable.
Related in this group: certificate of analysis · Janoshik Analytical · Medutest · PeptideMeter · VendorInvestigate · third-party testing · blind sampling · documentation quality · underdosing · mislabelling · customs · shipping
51 topics · page 1 of 2
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reused chromatograms across lots: how to spot it
On the subject in the title: Reused chromatograms across lots: how to spot it Working notes rather than a conclusion. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in front of…
|
+53 | 60 | 9.5k | 4h |
|
How the vendor documentation pages are maintained, and by whom
How the vendor documentation pages are maintained, and by whom I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a…
|
2 | 6k | 4h | |
|
Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy
On the subject in the title: Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the maintainers asked…
|
+44 | 49 | 589 | 8h |
|
Coming back to: Why our vendor pages link the storefront and mark it sponsored
Why our vendor pages link the storefront and mark it sponsored I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the…
|
2 | 22k | 8h | |
|
Coming back to: Reconciling a supplier certificate with an independent result
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reconciling a supplier certificate with an independent result Everything below is what sits behind that. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the…
|
+26 | 30 | 45k | 16h |
|
Reporting a good result: why nobody bothers and why they should
Reporting a good result: why nobody bothers and why they should — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
2 | 3.5k | 17h | |
|
What a certificate commits its issuer to
The question in the title: What a certificate commits its issuer to I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+101 | 116 | 26k | 19h |
|
Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated
Comparing documentation quality across the directory, tabulated — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately…
|
+7 | 11 | 29k | 19h |
|
Revisiting: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Everything below is what sits behind that. Structured report rather than an…
|
+100 | 108 | 57k | 1d |
|
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on
What a certificate commits its issuer to — one year on — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+107 | 117 | 6.5k | 1d |
|
The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there
On the subject in the title: The report format the maintainers ask for, and why each field is there Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
4 | 6.3k | 1d | |
|
What a certificate commits its issuer to — the long version
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What a certificate commits its issuer to — the long version A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in front…
|
+20 | 26 | 21k | 2d |
|
[2026 update] A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction
On the subject in the title: A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…
|
+15 | 19 | 18k | 2d |
|
Follow-up: Reconciling a label claim with a content assay
Reconciling a label claim with a content assay Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere.…
|
+26 | 30 | 6.5k | 14d |
|
Purity assay versus content assay: two different numbers
On the subject in the title: Purity assay versus content assay: two different numbers Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A…
|
+6 | 10 | 24k | 25d |
|
A checklist for reading a certificate in under two minutes
A checklist for reading a certificate in under two minutes — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere.…
|
+39 | 46 | 38k | 1mo |
|
Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports
Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
3 | 11k | 2mo | |
|
About the COA interpretation category
What a certificate of analysis commits its issuer to, which fields matter, and how to spot one that says almost nothing. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and…
|
+8 | 12 | 8.5k | 2mo |
|
Reused chromatograms across lots: how to spot it — what changed since
Reused chromatograms across lots: how to spot it — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
|
+34 | 39 | 20k | 2mo |
|
Second pass at: What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly
Second pass at: What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…
|
+94 | 102 | 20k | 3mo |
|
Coming back to: Which fields on a certificate actually matter, ranked
Which fields on a certificate actually matter, ranked I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
2 | 15k | 4mo | |
|
Which fields on a certificate actually matter, ranked
Which fields on a certificate actually matter, ranked — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+25 | 29 | 46k | 4mo |
|
Reconciling a label claim with a content assay
On the subject in the title: Reconciling a label claim with a content assay Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A…
|
+2 | 6 | 183 | 4mo |
|
"Greater than or equal to 99%" as a specification rather than a result
"Greater than or equal to 99%" as a specification rather than a result Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would…
|
+132 | 146 | 47k | 5mo |
|
Specification in the result column: why that is a meaningful error
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Specification in the result column: why that is a meaningful error Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would…
|
+107 | 129 | 41k | 5mo |
|
Coming back to: "Greater than or equal to 99%" as a specification rather than a result
Posting this under the heading it deserves: "Greater than or equal to 99%" as a specification rather than a result Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I…
|
2 | 31k | 6mo | |
|
What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly
What "verified" means on our vendor pages, stated narrowly — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a…
|
+27 | 31 | 27k | 7mo |
|
Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies
Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+27 | 31 | 4.9k | 7mo |
|
Water content on a certificate and why it changes the arithmetic — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Water content on a certificate and why it changes the arithmetic — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. A documentation question rather than an analytical…
|
3 | 801 | 8mo | |
|
How the vendor documentation pages are maintained, and by whom — what changed since
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How the vendor documentation pages are maintained, and by whom — what changed since A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better…
|
+98 | 104 | 3k | 8mo |
Sponsored
Janoshik Analytical — independent third-party testingHPLC purity and mass-spectrometric identity on submitted samples, reported with the method stated. The laboratory most often cited in this community’s verification records.Independent testing →
Sponsored
GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — synthesis, directFounded 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, over 1,500 staff and 200-plus patents. Custom peptide synthesis and amino acid derivatives, with a batch certificate on every order.Custom synthesis →