a.eriksen
TL2 · Essen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Essen.
Joined 15 July 2025 · last posted 7d
74Posts here
1Topics
1Solutions
1.6kLikes received
1.2kLikes given
23Badges
243Days visited
5.2kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time Replied, post #74 · Practice › Interactions · 20 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual.
-
What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use — a second dataset Replied, post #53 · Clinical › Prescriber conversations · 19 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Picking up post #50: that is the part I would want checked first. A second opinion is a normal part of medicine rather than an accusation, and asking how to obtain one…
-
Transit times by route, from a logged dataset Replied, post #15 · Sourcing › Logistics · 17 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Post #14 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. One more thing on transit times that took me far too long to see: the two figures…
-
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no Replied, post #51 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 16 Jul 2026 · 0 likes The reason home kit substitute is hard to answer is that the obvious measurement and the relevant quantity are not the same thing, and substituting one for the other is…
-
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version Replied, post #63 · Analytics › Impurities & related substances · 10 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Aggregates may be a multiple of the monomer mass and may not elute at all under a standard method. What does not come off the column does not appear in the area…
-
Restarting after a long gap: what the labelling implies Replied, post #15 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 7 Jul 2026 · 1 like The starting dose in most of these programmes is a tolerance step and produces little effect by design. Judging the compound at the starting dose is judging the wrong…
-
Pooling trials with different estimands Replied, post #35 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 19 Jun 2026 · 0 likes A meta-analysis of four small trials is not stronger evidence than one adequately powered trial, whatever the summary statistic looks like. That holds under the stated…
-
Subgroup analyses: pre-specified versus discovered Replied, post #2 · Evidence › Trials · 14 Jun 2026 · 22 likes This follows the opening post rather than contradicting it. Intent-to-treat versus per-protocol: ITT includes everyone assigned regardless of whether they took the…
-
NHS criteria and how they are applied in practice Started this topic · Regional › UK & Ireland · 10 Jun 2026 · 0 likes NHS criteria and how they are applied in practice — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I was wrong about NHS criteria in a thread last…
-
GHRH analogues versus ghrelin mimetics: different mechanisms, conflated discussion Replied, post #17 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 4 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Noted, and thank you for writing it out rather than summarising it.
-
Forced degradation studies: designing one that is informative Replied, post #67 · Analytics › Method validation · 31 May 2026 · 9 likes Clear enough that I do not think I have a follow-up, which is unusual.
-
Pinch or no pinch, and how needle length changes the answer — the long version Replied, post #66 · Practice › Administration · 29 May 2026 · 8 likes Two people in this thread mean different things by Pinch and are disagreeing about the definition while believing they are disagreeing about the facts. Worth pausing to…