d.eriksen
TL2 · Aalborg
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Aalborg.
Joined 17 June 2025 · last posted 3d
76Posts here
1Topics
0Solutions
486Likes received
338Likes given
19Badges
144Days visited
2.1kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version Replied, post #112 · Analytics › Impurities & related substances · 25 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Aggregates may be a multiple of the monomer mass and may not elute at all under a standard method. What does not come off the column does not appear in the area…
-
Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply? Replied, post #65 · Start Here › How to Ask · 22 Jul 2026 · 8 likes Adding a note of thanks rather than an opinion. I did not know most of that.
-
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset Replied, post #109 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 21 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Useful. I have added it to my own notes with the date on it.
-
Follow-up: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Replied, post #74 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 14 Jul 2026 · 1 like Prior authorisation criteria are usually published by the payer, and reading them before the appointment changes the outcome more than anything else does. Noting that…
-
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Replied, post #114 · Evidence › Journal club · 11 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Same experience here, different supplier, so it is at least not unique to one of them.
-
Batch numbers that do not match the vial label Replied, post #41 · Sourcing › Red flags · 10 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Noted, and thank you for writing it out rather than summarising it.
-
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #82 · Meta › Feature requests · 5 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Picking up post #79: that is the part I would want checked first. Having read the whole per-category review queue thread before replying: the question in the first post…
-
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Replied, post #79 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 3 Jul 2026 · 24 likes Research-use-only material is not certified for anything by anybody, and no home procedure changes that. What home checks buy you is early detection of the obvious…
-
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — does this still hold? Replied, post #34 · Research Methods › N-of-1 designs · 29 Jun 2026 · 12 likes This follows post #31 rather than contradicting it. Worth separating Washout as a question about the compound from Washout as a question about the documentation. They…
-
A widely repeated interaction claim that turns out to be unsupported — what changed since Replied, post #68 · Practice › Interactions · 20 Jun 2026 · 3 likes A pharmacist can answer most questions in this subcategory in a few minutes with access to a proper interaction database, and that access is the thing a forum does not…
-
Reference intervals: how they are constructed and why one in twenty flags Replied, post #115 · Clinical › Bloodwork · 15 Jun 2026 · 0 likes On post #112 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Liver enzymes: elevation does not specify cause. ALT and AST can rise from many things. Bilirubin helps…
-
Micronutrient adequacy at low total intake Replied, post #86 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 13 Jun 2026 · 30 likes Tracking intake for a week rather than permanently is usually enough to find out whether there is a problem. Permanent tracking has its own costs. I would be interested…