f.lindholm

TL2 Moderator · Curitiba

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Curitiba.

Joined 26 January 2025 · last posted 2d

75Posts here

0Topics

1Solutions

888Likes received

992Likes given

22Badges

172Days visited

2.4kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Dizziness on standing: the ordinary explanation first — one year on Replied, post #17 · Nutrition & Training › Hydration & electrolytes · 26 Jul 2026 · 1 like For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Athletes in weight-category sports: a different risk calculus Replied, post #41 · Clinical › Special populations · 25 Jul 2026 · 5 likes On post #37 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Two things before anyone answers the substance. First, the context in the first post is clear and…
Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Replied, post #125 · Evidence › Journal club · 21 Jul 2026 · 13 likes TRIUMPH (ongoing): Retatrutide phase 3. No results yet. Nothing should be attributed to it because it has not finished. When it does, this discussion will return to it.
Coming back to: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with… Replied, post #97 · Analytics › Method validation · 20 Jul 2026 · 6 likes I read post #95 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say…
[2026 update] Interpreting a result that disagrees with the supplier's certificate Replied, post #87 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 13 Jul 2026 · 0 likes How to submit a sample: contact the service directly. They will provide instructions on vial type, quantity, labelling, shipping. Following their instructions exactly…
Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats Replied, post #37 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own…
Comparing prices across jurisdictions without misleading yourself Replied, post #57 · Access › Pricing · 9 Jun 2026 · 18 likes post #56 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. List prices versus negotiated prices: the price a pharmaceutical company publishes and…
Run-in periods and the population they select Replied, post #133 · Evidence › Trials · 9 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Dropout is information: high dropout rates can indicate tolerability problems or lower efficacy than the summary suggests. Where the analysis handled dropouts matters.…
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author Replied, post #9 · Evidence › Study critique · 8 Jun 2026 · 7 likes Criticise the method, not the author: a paper with a weak design is not a bad paper by someone with bad intentions. It is a paper that answers a limited question.…
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Replied, post #45 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 6 Jun 2026 · 6 likes For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Spreadsheets: an appreciation — what changed since Replied, post #61 · Lounge › Off topic · 4 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Not a rules-free zone: the guidelines still apply. No phones, no Telegram, no endorsements of other communities. Just a relaxed bar for how directly the topic needs to…
Coming back to: How much context is too much context in a first post? Replied, post #4 · Start Here › How to Ask · 28 May 2026 · 3 likes Five questions in one post gets you one answer: the easiest one, usually not the one you needed most. Post them separately or pick the one that depends on the others…