o.cousineau
TL3 Regular · Zlín, CZ
Long-standing member. Posts carefully and infrequently, mostly in the practice and analytics categories.
Joined 5 August 2024 · last posted 23h
136Posts here
1Topics
0Solutions
1.3kLikes received
2.4kLikes given
26Badges
317Days visited
6.1kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Replied, post #126 · Evidence › Journal club · 27 Jul 2026 · 8 likes Post #125 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. The figures usually contain the finding and the text usually contains the…
-
Second pass at: What a 2 ppm match establishes, and what it does not Replied, post #49 · Analytics › Mass spectrometry · 25 Jul 2026 · 12 likes On post #45 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Positional isomers and epimers are mass-identical. Any argument that a mass result rules them out is…
-
Private prescribing in the UK: what is actually involved Replied, post #73 · Regional › UK & Ireland · 23 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Seconded. It reads as careful rather than confident, which is the right register.
-
Micro-titration: a disputed topic, argued properly Replied, post #107 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 19 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Answering the micro-titration question as asked, then the question I think is meant. As asked: yes, with the qualification below. As meant: it depends on how the first…
-
Muscle cramps: the ordinary causes before the exotic ones — a second dataset Replied, post #59 · Practice › Side effects · 18 Jul 2026 · 0 likes That is a fair summary of where the discussion has got to.
-
Tracking a shortage from primary sources rather than rumour Replied, post #106 · Access › Shortages · 16 Jul 2026 · 1 like Coming back to post #104, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. A note on scope: what I am saying about tracking a shortage applies to the case…
-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #94 · Lounge › Off topic · 16 Jul 2026 · 0 likes I would call the community position on best-written scientific paper likely rather than established, and I would be comfortable defending that hedge.
-
Pooling trials with different estimands Replied, post #90 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 12 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Pooling trials with different estimands is worth one more sentence than it usually gets, and the sentence is the one about how the number was arrived at.
-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #83 · Lounge › Off topic · 10 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Trying to state the best-written scientific paper position in a way that someone who disagrees would recognise as fair, because I do not think the version in this…
-
Osteoarthritis and mechanical versus metabolic improvement — one year on Replied, post #22 · Clinical › Comorbidities · 10 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Worth separating two things that post #18 runs together. A request rather than an answer: could whoever has the primary source for Osteoarthritis and mechanical versus…
-
Asking a follow-up: new topic or new reply? Replied, post #46 · Start Here › How to Ask · 10 Jul 2026 · 0 likes If you are asking about a document, quote the exact wording of the line you are asking about. Paraphrasing a specification is how a discussion ends up about a document…
-
Programming during a large energy deficit Replied, post #35 · Nutrition & Training › Resistance training · 8 Jul 2026 · 30 likes Post #34 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Machine-based work is often better tolerated when energy is low and is not inferior for…