The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

[2026 update] Reverting an edit that had no revision note

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 13, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
NR
n.rowntreeTL3Regular16 Jul 2025#1

Reverting an edit that had no revision note — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

Process question about how this site works.

I have read the guidelines and the trust-level page and I still have a question about the mechanism rather than the rule. Specifically, I would like to understand the reasoning behind it, because I suspect the reasoning is better than the rule sounds.

Not a complaint. If the answer is "because of a failure mode you have not seen yet", I would like to hear about the failure mode.

12 likes 12mo
AV
a.vukovicTL2 Moderator22 Jul 2025#4
n.rowntree, post #1: Reverting an edit that had no revision note — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level page and I still have a question about the mechanism rather than the rule. Specifically, I would like to understand the reasoning… Go to post

post #3 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Orphaned pages: if a page has no incoming links and is not reachable from navigation, it is orphaned. Such pages should either be linked or deprecated.

23 likes in reply to #1 12mo
KF
k.fonsecaTL2 Moderator28 Jul 2025#8
k.vanhecke, post #7: On post #3 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing. The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough. Go to post

post #7 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Cross-referencing: if two pages should reference each other but do not, suggesting the cross-reference helps the maintainer see the connection.

31 likes in reply to #7 12mo
EK
ew.kuuselaTL2 Moderator1 Aug 2025#11
k.fonseca, post #8: post #7 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Cross-referencing: if two pages should reference each other but do not, suggesting the cross-reference helps the maintainer see the connection. Go to post

This follows post #8 rather than contradicting it.

Revision disputes: if you disagree with an edit a maintainer made, discussing it here invites resolution rather than conflict.

11 likes in reply to #8 12mo
TW
t.waldenstrmTL2Member3 Aug 2025#12

Review dates: each maintained page has a review date (the date by which it should be checked). If a page is past its review date, flagging it here alerts the maintainer.

24 likes 12mo

Read the full topic (13 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Reverting an edit that had no revision note
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Reverting an edit that had no revision note Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic…
GPAVDAMN+17 21 4.5k 12mo
Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed
On the subject in the title: Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
HSRMMSBHF+92 101 2.9k 2mo
Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold?
Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
THZVDWONZ+27 31 52k 15mo
Pages past their review date, listed
Pages past their review date, listed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question…
CLONKSHFF+26 30 6.4k 10mo
[2026 update] Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed
Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the…
ATPPMVNGMO+41 45 47k 12mo

Related topics — sharing the tags wiki post, citation check, maintainership

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Wiki requests category
Request a new maintained page, or flag one that has drifted out of date. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note.…
KOBTFCKLO+3 7 655 19mo
Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Review cadence: how often is a page actually re-checked? Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question…
RHPTATJSS+20 24 20k 15mo
Request declined, with reasoning — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request declined, with reasoning — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
DHDFBCCCR+34 38 9.4k 2mo
Coming back to: Recording a dissent on a document rather than suppressing it
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Recording a dissent on a document rather than suppressing it Everything below is what sits behind that. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
JDZGVRSCV+43 47 11k 16mo
Request: a diff view for wiki revisions — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request: a diff view for wiki revisions — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
BSOBVDFB+96 104 61k 6mo