The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Meta · Site feedback

A friction point in the promotion workflow

FP
forest_plotTL3Evidence synthesis14 Jul 2025#1

A friction point in the promotion workflow — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons.

The topic in question keeps being re-asked, has a good marked solution, and contains a worked example that would be more useful on a page with a review date than buried in a reply. That is exactly the promotion criterion as written.

Objections welcome and genuinely wanted — the whole point of discussing promotions in public is that a bad promotion is harder to undo than a bad reply.

35 likes 12mo
WP
weekly_pinTL2Regular24 Jul 2025#2

Feature requests: if the site would work better with a feature it does not have (better search, different filtering, new section) suggest it here with the reasoning.

8 likes 12mo
SA
s.adebayoTL2 Moderator31 Jul 2025 · edited#3

Worth separating two things that the opening post runs together.

Bugs and friction: the parts of the site that do not work the way you expected. Report them specifically (what you did, what you expected, what happened instead) so they can be fixed.

2 likes 12mo
FN
formulary_notesTL3Regular6 Aug 2025#4

the opening post is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Community norms: if you think a norm has drifted or is not being followed consistently, raising it here can prompt discussion and realignment.

0 likes 12mo
CA
c.amankwahTL212 Aug 2025#5
TH
TL4_HalvorsenTL4Leader · Journal club18 Aug 2025#6

Picking up post #3: that is the part I would want checked first.

Performance: if pages are slow to load, timeouts occur, or the site is unresponsive, that is worth reporting with details (when, which pages, how slow).

12 likes 11mo
RE
r.ekstromTL2 Moderator23 Aug 2025#7
TL4_Halvorsen, post #6: Picking up post #3: that is the part I would want checked first. Performance: if pages are slow to load, timeouts occur, or the site is unresponsive, that is worth reporting with details (when, which pages, how slow). Go to post

On post #3 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

Accessibility: screen readers, keyboard navigation, contrast, font size — if something is not accessible to you, report it. Accessibility matters.

4 likes in reply to #6 11mo
EF
endo_fellow_rkTL3Endocrinology fellow28 Aug 2025#8
TL4_Halvorsen, post #6: Picking up post #3: that is the part I would want checked first. Performance: if pages are slow to load, timeouts occur, or the site is unresponsive, that is worth reporting with details (when, which pages, how slow). Go to post

Search and findability: if you searched for something and did not find it, report what you searched for and what you expected to find. That helps improve indexing and tagging.

0 likes in reply to #6 11mo
GT
g.tammTL2 Moderator2 Sep 2025#9

I read post #7 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Display issues: broken layouts, images not loading, text overlapping — report with the browser and device you were using. Display bugs are platform-specific.

0 likes 11mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Site feedback category
Bugs, friction, and the parts of the site that do not work the way you expected. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and…
JMSLVDAHKR 4 54k 10mo
Search filters: what is missing
Search filters: what is missing — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps being…
LEBAELHFSC+74 84 15k 3d
A friction point in the promotion workflow — the long version
On the subject in the title: A friction point in the promotion workflow — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic…
SLNSRARZMD+1 5 46k 13mo
Second pass at: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate?
Second pass at: The topic list is dense — is that deliberate? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Nominating something for promotion into the…
JWFVSLSGGT+102 108 8.4k 4mo
The topic list is dense — is that deliberate?
The topic list is dense — is that deliberate? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The…
QZBFBSFLIL+83 91 49k 18mo

Related topics — sharing the tags guidelines, moderation, site feedback

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Whether an aggregate is worth publishing at all: a disputed topic
On the subject in the title: Whether an aggregate is worth publishing at all: a disputed topic Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
PEGLIGHNMD+20 24 18k 13mo
Validating a calculator against hand arithmetic — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Validating a calculator against hand arithmetic — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would…
CRVMNIBI+121 137 21k 13mo
[2026 update] Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed
Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the…
ATPPMVNGMO+41 45 47k 12mo
Revisiting: Maintainer handover: how it works
Revisiting: Maintainer handover: how it works Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the…
SCNITPESUC+53 57 664 4mo
Follow-up: I have no scientific background — can I still follow the analytics categories?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: I have no scientific background — can I still follow the analytics categories? Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include…
VNMVPPNSPR+15 19 15k 1mo