The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Meta · Wiki maintenance · continued

Citation sweep results: how many references did not say what was claimed posts 91–102

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

HS
hana.satoTL4 Moderator8 May 2026#91
v.kjaer, post #59: Review dates: each maintained page has a review date (the date by which it should be checked). If a page is past its review date, flagging it here alerts the maintainer. Go to post
Staff post. Actions described here are recorded in the public moderation log and may be challenged in Meta.

Redundancy: if two maintained pages cover largely the same ground, consolidation might improve clarity. Pointing out redundancy helps maintainers see the issue.

0 likes in reply to #59 3mo
FA
f.amankwahTL2 Moderator9 May 2026#92

Revision disputes: if you disagree with an edit a maintainer made, discussing it here invites resolution rather than conflict.

26 likes 3mo
PI
p.iyer_pharmdTL3Pharmacist11 May 2026#93

I read post #91 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Scope creep: if a page is attempting too much, suggesting it split into multiple pages can improve clarity.

8 likes 3mo
CO
c.ostergaardTL2 Moderator13 May 2026#94

This follows post #91 rather than contradicting it.

Cross-referencing: if two pages should reference each other but do not, suggesting the cross-reference helps the maintainer see the connection.

2 likes 3mo
BI
blank_injectionTL2Analytical chemist14 May 2026#95
h.karlsen, post #71: Redundancy: if two maintained pages cover largely the same ground, consolidation might improve clarity. Pointing out redundancy helps maintainers see the issue. Go to post

Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.

The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.

0 likes in reply to #71 2mo
HI
h.iyerTL2 Moderator16 May 2026#96
in.guerrero, post #51: On post #47 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Maintainer handovers: if a page's maintainer is inactive and needs a new one, discussing that here can facilitate the transition. Go to post

Authority: if you think a page needs input from someone with specific expertise, suggesting that person helps the maintainer recruit contributors.

19 likes in reply to #51 2mo
FP
forest_plotTL3Evidence synthesis18 May 2026 · edited#97

Coming back to post #95, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Maintainer handovers: if a page's maintainer is inactive and needs a new one, discussing that here can facilitate the transition.

4 likes 2mo
NV
n.villalobosTL2 Moderator19 May 2026#98

Picking up post #95: that is the part I would want checked first.

Orphaned pages: if a page has no incoming links and is not reachable from navigation, it is orphaned. Such pages should either be linked or deprecated.

0 likes 2mo
AS
a.sorensenTL221 May 2026#99
AS
a.salcedoTL3Regular23 May 2026#100
Tamburello, post #63: Authority: if you think a page needs input from someone with specific expertise, suggesting that person helps the maintainer recruit contributors. Go to post

post #99 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Evidence synthesis: if you think a page should cover recent evidence or a new development, suggesting specific content helps the maintainer prioritise updates.

13 likes in reply to #63 2mo
B
BramleyTL2Member24 May 2026#101

I read post #99 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Review dates: each maintained page has a review date (the date by which it should be checked). If a page is past its review date, flagging it here alerts the maintainer.

6 likes 2mo
RC
r.chukwuTL2 Moderator26 May 2026#102
l.lundgren, post #62: Worth separating two things that post #58 runs together. Evidence synthesis: if you think a page should cover recent evidence or a new development, suggesting specific content helps the maintainer prioritise updates. Go to post

This follows post #99 rather than contradicting it.

Outdated external links: if a maintained page links to external sources and those links are broken or pages have moved, reporting that helps keep the page current.

1 like in reply to #62 2mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
An orphaned page with no inbound links — the long version
Posting this under the heading it deserves: An orphaned page with no inbound links — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
KGTNEKIA+14 18 21k 10mo
An orphaned page with no inbound links
An orphaned page with no inbound links — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps…
RAHNKKNVM+44 48 7.5k 14mo
About the Wiki maintenance category
Review dates, orphaned pages, maintainer handovers, and revision disputes. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
SLJMRVGVMO 4 42k 15mo
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
EDABAVBNRV+11 15 40k 16h
A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: A revision dispute resolved on the topic rather than in the history — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have…
FPIGRIDLA+45 50 33k 20mo

Related topics — sharing the tags moderation, maintainership, citation check

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — one year on
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the…
OFLOPMDBEV+46 51 11k 20h
New subcategory: rationale and scope
On the subject in the title: New subcategory: rationale and scope Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level page and I…
KVSFTENMH+126 138 13k 9mo
About the Announcements category
Staff announcements, policy changes, and scheduled maintenance. Read-only except for questions. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with…
BNJMVSITSC+3 7 8.7k 4h
Coming back to: Request: tag synonyms surfaced in search
Request: tag synonyms surfaced in search Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the…
FNDVSF 2 26k 13mo
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections
Review: a draft on reconstitution arithmetic, with objections Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
ASSFFPASNS+120 129 4.1k 15mo