The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Journal club: SURMOUNT-4 and continuation versus withdrawal

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 37, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
MA
m.agyemanTL2 Moderator9 Mar 2026#5

Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.

The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.

29 likes 5mo
BR
b.restrepoTL2 Moderator16 Mar 2026#9

Coming back to post #7, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative reduction.

22 likes 4mo
HC
h.castellanosTL2 Moderator27 Mar 2026#16
b.restrepo, post #9: Coming back to post #7, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. SELECT (N Engl J Med 2023): Semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes without diabetes. The first outcome trial in people without diabetes, which decoupled the cardiovascular argument from glucose control. Read the absolute numbers, not just the relative… Go to post

SURPASS-2 (N Engl J Med 2021): Direct comparison of tirzepatide with semaglutide 1.0 mg. The 1.0 mg dose is not the highest available, which is the central and legitimate criticism of the head-to-head evidence.

29 likes in reply to #9 4mo
UC
unit_conversionTL3Regular3 Apr 2026#21

Coming back to post #19, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Session format: read the paper before posting. The discussion is much better when everyone has. Start with the estimand and population, then methods, then results, then limitations. That order makes critique coherent.

30 likes 4mo
OB
owen.bradyTL4 Moderator24 Apr 2026#37
unit_conversion, post #21: Coming back to post #19, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Session format: read the paper before posting. The discussion is much better when everyone has. Start with the estimand and population, then methods, then results, then limitations. That order makes critique coherent. Go to post
Staff post. Actions described here are recorded in the public moderation log and may be challenged in Meta.

SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.

24 likes in reply to #21 3mo

Read the full topic (37 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal
On the subject in the title: Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
LAMRZHOJI+110 122 46k 1d
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
LFVDAERASV+7 11 33k 7mo
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
On the subject in the title: Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before posting; the…
NAFPALVSFT+114 125 2.5k 23h
Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove
On the subject in the title: Journal club: STEP 4 and what a withdrawal design can prove Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before…
DJTVGHIO+61 65 2k 13mo
Journal club: SURMOUNT-4 and continuation versus withdrawal — a second dataset
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: SURMOUNT-4 and continuation versus withdrawal — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with FLOW…
VMLADNWMD+58 64 17k 13mo

Related topics — sharing the tags journal club, number needed to treat, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Citing a preprint in a maintained document: our rule and its reasoning
On the subject in the title: Citing a preprint in a maintained document: our rule and its reasoning Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a…
OVSLTN 2 467 4mo
Coming back to: A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author
A critique that turned out to be unfair, retracted by its author — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not…
IAQLJB 2 1.3k 14mo
Second pass at: Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them
Second pass at: Historical amylin analogues and what happened to them — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim…
ALCIPFBSV+15 19 22k 18mo
Follow-up: Retatrutide phase 2 in type 2 diabetes: the Lancet paper
Retatrutide phase 2 in type 2 diabetes: the Lancet paper Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a claim I…
CDBNVSRAKF+1 5 31k 8mo
Follow-up: Is "synergy" the right word for the combination data?
Is "synergy" the right word for the combination data? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) cited in support of a…
CLBKSS 2 41k 14mo