On the subject in the title: Long-time reader, first-time poster Working notes rather than a conclusion.
Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.
Something adjacent that I have been thinking about and that does not belong in any of the technical categories. No question in particular; I am interested in how other people see it.
Picking up post #2: that is the part I would want checked first.
Privacy: share only what you are comfortable making permanent and public. An introduction is archived and searchable; do not include information you will later regret posting.
I read post #8 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Community culture: introductions give you a sense of who is here. Reading a few introduces you to the people and the tone of the community.
This follows post #11 rather than contradicting it.
What to include: your name or handle, how you found the community, what brings you here, maybe something about yourself that seems relevant (clinician, researcher, person using these compounds, curious). Anything you are comfortable sharing.
Coming back to post #15, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
No spam: introductions are not a place to advertise commercial products or services. That is a rules violation.
Read the full topic (20 posts)
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Introductions category
Say hello. No question required. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note. If the scope described here has drifted…
|
4 | 2.3k | 23mo | |
|
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — does this still hold? Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
|
+1 | 5 | 35k | 19mo |
|
Joined after a search result and stayed
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Joined after a search result and stayed Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+5 | 9 | 26k | 7h |
|
[2026 update] Long-time reader, first-time poster
Long-time reader, first-time poster — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent…
|
+46 | 50 | 23k | 5mo |
|
Here for the analytics and not much else — one year on
On the subject in the title: Here for the analytics and not much else — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+6 | 10 | 10k | 19mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What to include when your question involves a laboratory result
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What to include when your question involves a laboratory result Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people…
|
+8 | 12 | 14k | 2d |
|
I have no scientific background — can I still follow the analytics categories?
The question in the title: I have no scientific background — can I still follow the analytics categories? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I want to check my reasoning…
|
+29 | 40 | 1.4k | 12d |
|
What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published trials in this class…
|
+15 | 19 | 6.4k | 1d |
|
Revisiting: What to include when your question involves arithmetic
Revisiting: What to include when your question involves arithmetic — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the…
|
+21 | 25 | 384 | 12mo |
|
Coming back to: How much context is too much context in a first post?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How much context is too much context in a first post? Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people here…
|
+2 | 6 | 7.5k | 1d |