The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Lounge · Introductions

Here for the analytics and not much else — one year on

SR
s.rasmussenTL2 Moderator3 Oct 2024#1

On the subject in the title: Here for the analytics and not much else — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion.

Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.

Something adjacent that I have been thinking about and that does not belong in any of the technical categories. No question in particular; I am interested in how other people see it.

1 like 22mo
SB
s.bruunTL2 Moderator18 Oct 2024#2

Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.

5 likes 21mo
CD
c.delgadoTL2 Moderator28 Oct 2024#3
s.bruun, post #2: Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive. Go to post

post #2 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Lurking first: if you want to introduce yourself after lurking a bit, that is fine. You do not have to introduce yourself before your first technical post either.

14 likes in reply to #2 21mo
AL
a.lindholmTL2 Moderator7 Nov 2024#4

Worth separating two things that post #2 runs together.

Welcome: the response to introductions is usually welcome. People will reply to introduce themselves back or to let you know they are glad you are here.

28 likes 21mo
KD
k.dahlbergTL2 Moderator16 Nov 2024#5

Picking up post #2: that is the part I would want checked first.

I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.

The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.

2 likes 20mo
OB
owen.bradyTL4 Moderator24 Nov 2024#6
s.bruun, post #2: Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive. Go to post

Following up: if you introduce yourself and someone asks a follow-up question, you can reply here or in a direct message depending on what feels right.

9 likes in reply to #2 20mo
GR
g.rasmussenTL2 Moderator2 Dec 2024#7
c.delgado, post #3: post #2 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Lurking first: if you want to introduce yourself after lurking a bit, that is fine. You do not have to introduce yourself before your first technical post either. Go to post

Ongoing: you can post multiple introductions over time. If you return after a long break, reintroducing yourself is fine.

20 likes in reply to #3 20mo
AR
a.reyesTL410 Dec 2024#8
CI
c.inglethorpeTL3Regular17 Dec 2024#9

This follows post #6 rather than contradicting it.

Community culture: introductions give you a sense of who is here. Reading a few introduces you to the people and the tone of the community.

4 likes 19mo
LD
l.dialloTL2 Moderator25 Dec 2024#10
s.bruun, post #2: Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive. Go to post

I read post #8 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Say hello. No question required. Introduce yourself if you want to give context for why you are here, or just introduce yourself because you like meeting people.

13 likes in reply to #2 19mo
UC
unit_conversionTL3Regular1 Jan 2025#11

No judgment: people come to this community from all backgrounds and with all motivations. Introductions are for getting to know each other, not for evaluation.

0 likes 19mo
Moved from Off topic by KLindqvist. Category placement is not obvious from outside and getting it wrong is expected. This topic will get better answers here. The move is recorded in the public log citing R7.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
AKJMSSHDRM+2 6 10k 15mo
Revisiting: Joined after a search result and stayed
Revisiting: Joined after a search result and stayed Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a…
ZSFFHS 2 1.6k 22mo
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if…
IJRJSATCC+13 17 23k 2mo
[2026 update] Long-time reader, first-time poster
Long-time reader, first-time poster — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent…
CAWFEGFSK+46 50 23k 5mo
Long-time reader, first-time poster
On the subject in the title: Long-time reader, first-time poster Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent…
FPICPJHVN+15 19 2.5k 8mo

Related topics — sharing the tags beginner friendly, onboarding

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Coming back to: How much context is too much context in a first post?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How much context is too much context in a first post? Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people here…
SGSSBSFLD+2 6 7.5k 1d
What this community means by "a source", in practical terms
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What this community means by "a source", in practical terms Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people…
CMIAGVALH+107 122 1.9k 10mo
How to ask about something you suspect is a bad idea
The question in the title: How to ask about something you suspect is a bad idea I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to…
SVRZRAEVEF+81 87 16k 2mo
Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Question in the title. Context below, and I…
ACAWCTDCR+29 33 29k 10mo
What "marked as solution" means and who gets to mark it
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What "marked as solution" means and who gets to mark it Question in the title. Context below, and I have tried to include the things people here…
PNCCNK 2 290 1d