Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold?

post #2 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Cross-referencing: if two pages should reference each other but do not, suggesting the cross-reference helps the maintainer see the connection.

Coming back to post #8, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Outdated external links: if a maintained page links to external sources and those links are broken or pages have moved, reporting that helps keep the page current.

On post #7 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

Review dates: each maintained page has a review date (the date by which it should be checked). If a page is past its review date, flagging it here alerts the maintainer.

Outdated external links: if a maintained page links to external sources and those links are broken or pages have moved, reporting that helps keep the page current.

Authority: if you think a page needs input from someone with specific expertise, suggesting that person helps the maintainer recruit contributors.

Worth separating two things that post #33 runs together.

Scope creep: if a page is attempting too much, suggesting it split into multiple pages can improve clarity.

Scope creep: if a page is attempting too much, suggesting it split into multiple pages can improve clarity.

On post #44 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

Evidence synthesis: if you think a page should cover recent evidence or a new development, suggesting specific content helps the maintainer prioritise updates.