Reaching a dose and staying there for a year: a longitudinal note — does this still hold?
post #6 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Micro-titration: the concept of increments smaller than the labelled steps. It has no evidence base from trials but is described by some people. The downside is that very small increments are hard to measure accurately with a syringe.
Holding a dose indefinitely: the trials did not study indefinite holding at a non-maximum dose. The trials escalated to a target and then held that. What happens if you stay at an intermediate dose for years is not formally studied and extrapolation is the best available reasoning.
When a dose reduction is the correct response to a side effect: if a side effect is dose-dependent (nausea, constipation, injection discomfort), reducing the dose is a reasonable response. If the side effect is not dose-dependent (e.g., hypoglycemia with insulin), dose reduction does not address the issue.
post #24 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Holding a dose indefinitely: the trials did not study indefinite holding at a non-maximum dose. The trials escalated to a target and then held that. What happens if you stay at an intermediate dose for years is not formally studied and extrapolation is the best available reasoning.
Coming back to post #29, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
The four-week escalation interval is a convention from the pivotal trials, not a pharmacological constant. The pharmacological argument is that with a week-long half-life, four weeks approaches steady state and you can assess the dose fairly. That is an argument for not going faster. It is not an argument against going slower.
Read the full topic (40 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Escalating every six weeks instead of four: what I observed over eight months — one year onPractice › Dosing & titration · 59 replies
- How the published trials escalated, tabulated side by side — does this still hold?Practice › Dosing & titration · 2 replies
- Restarting after a long gap: what the labelling implies — the long versionPractice › Dosing & titration · 17 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The arithmetic of an intermediate dose between two label steps
On the subject in the title: The arithmetic of an intermediate dose between two label steps Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a gap, so I am…
|
2 | 136 | 2mo | |
|
The lowest dose that does anything: is that a real question?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: The lowest dose that does anything: is that a real question? I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a gap, so I am asking rather…
|
+100 | 111 | 9.1k | 5mo |
|
About the Dosing & titration category
Schedules, escalation intervals, dose reductions, and the arithmetic that connects a vial to a syringe mark. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…
|
4 | 350 | 4mo | |
|
How the published trials escalated, tabulated side by side — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: How the published trials escalated, tabulated side by side — does this still hold? A question about technique rather than about dose. I have been…
|
2 | 8.9k | 9mo | |
|
Reaching a dose and staying there for a year: a longitudinal note
Reaching a dose and staying there for a year: a longitudinal note Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have a…
|
2 | 763 | 15mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags missed dose, tirzepatide, dose reduction
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Escalating every six weeks instead of four: what I observed over eight months — one year on
On the subject in the title: Escalating every six weeks instead of four: what I observed over eight months — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have read the maintained page on this and I…
|
+55 | 59 | 9.1k | 10mo |
|
Air bubbles in a subcutaneous injection: the honest risk assessment — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Air bubbles in a subcutaneous injection: the honest risk assessment — does this still hold? Reporting something rather than asking about it, in…
|
+21 | 30 | 20k | 4mo |
|
Why a pen's dose steps are fixed and what that costs you
The question in the title: Why a pen's dose steps are fixed and what that costs you I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I have read the maintained page on this and I still have…
|
4 | 2.5k | 23h | |
|
Tirzepatide in type 2 diabetes: the SURPASS programme, summarised honestly
Tirzepatide in type 2 diabetes: the SURPASS programme, summarised honestly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with STEP 2 ( Lancet ,…
|
+150 | 163 | 22k | 11mo |
|
Coming back to: Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from
Semaglutide half-life: where the 165 to 184 hour figure comes from Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in…
|
+112 | 119 | 3.3k | 11mo |