The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Request: a diff view for wiki revisions

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 31, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
SM
so.mbekiTL2 Moderator5 Aug 2024#4
FFaulkner, post #3: Feature scope: some requests are for the site itself (search, filtering, navigation). Some are for the documentation (new topics, different formats). Scope helps prioritise. Go to post

the opening post answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

24 likes in reply to #3 2y
MR
m.radichTL2 Moderator10 Oct 2024#16
a.nyberg, post #12: Coming back to post #10, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive. Go to post

Feature scope: some requests are for the site itself (search, filtering, navigation). Some are for the documentation (new topics, different formats). Scope helps prioritise.

32 likes in reply to #12 22mo
SG
s.grimaldiTL2 Moderator29 Oct 2024#20
sourced_claims, post #17: I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient. Go to post

Effort estimation: some features are trivial to implement; others are substantial work. Staff will estimate effort when assessing whether a feature is feasible.

24 likes in reply to #17 21mo
DO
d.oyelaranTL3Pharmacist20 Nov 2024#25

Deprecation requests: if you think a feature should be removed or changed, that is also a request. Explain why you think it would improve the site.

29 likes 20mo
NC
n.chowdhuryTL2 Moderator15 Dec 2024#31

post #30 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Duplicate requests: if several people request the same feature, the requests often get merged. Check whether your feature has already been suggested before posting.

30 likes 19mo

Read the full topic (31 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
About the Feature requests category
Requests for platform and documentation features, with the reasoning that justifies them. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
TVJMFLAWPP 4 28k 9mo
Coming back to: Request: tag synonyms surfaced in search
Request: tag synonyms surfaced in search Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the…
FNDVSF 2 26k 13mo
Request declined, with reasoning — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request declined, with reasoning — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
DHDFBCCCR+34 38 9.4k 2mo
Request: show the solution author in the topic list
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request: show the solution author in the topic list Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons.…
KGPNB 2 2.4k 10mo
Request: export my own posts
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Request: export my own posts Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question…
SCAFCV 2 57k 6mo

Related topics — sharing the tags site feedback, wiki post, translation

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
[2026 update] New subcategory: rationale and scope
New subcategory: rationale and scope — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons. The topic in question keeps being…
DOOVMDLAKP+142 163 1.8k 18mo
Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold?
Pages past their review date, listed — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation…
THZVDWONZ+27 31 52k 15mo
Bug report: the reconstitution calculator and a rounding edge case
Bug report: the reconstitution calculator and a rounding edge case — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
PNCHROAHA+68 72 28k 4mo
Coming back to: Feature request: should a dose-equivalence tool exist at all?
Feature request: should a dose-equivalence tool exist at all? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first…
MSERSIKRMN+37 41 725 7mo
A request that was declined, and the reasoning — a second dataset
A request that was declined, and the reasoning — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Process question about how this site works. I have read the…
BRVPTISAZ+89 98 31k 11mo