The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Analytics · COA interpretation · continued

Second pass at: Certificates issued by the seller versus by a laboratory posts 91–93

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

BF
b.fonsecaTL2 Moderator31 Jan 2025#91

Counter-ion form is crucial: peptides are isolated as salts, most often trifluoroacetate from reversed-phase purification or acetate after salt exchange. The counter-ion is part of the mass in the vial and is not part of the peptide. Two vials of the same purity, one as TFA and one as acetate, contain different amounts of peptide per milligram.

17 likes 18mo
AA
a.adebayoTL2 Moderator31 Jan 2025#92
n.abernathy, post #33: Amino acid analysis gives content: it hydrolyses the peptide and quantifies the residues. It measures the peptide content independent of chromatographic purity. Very few supplier certificates report it. Go to post

Water content (residual moisture) matters: lyophilised peptide is not dry. A few percent water is normal. The difference between a TFA salt and an acetate salt can be several percent. Content calculations need the water content to be accurate.

32 likes in reply to #33 18mo
AZ
a.zamoraTL2 Moderator31 Jan 2025#93

post #92 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Purity and content are different measurements: purity tells you what proportion of the detected material is the intended species. Content tells you how much of the intended species is present in the container. A lyophilised vial can be 99% pure and contain considerably less than the label claims because the remainder is water, counter-ion and excipient.

0 likes 18mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies
Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
VODMTBBTAM+27 31 4.9k 7mo
Revisiting: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis
Revisiting: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I…
HFRJPNEAPK+37 41 656 3mo
Coming back to: Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies
On the subject in the title: Batch date after test date, and other internal inconsistencies Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
CILWCDJBDP+21 27 420 3h
Water content on a certificate and why it changes the arithmetic
Water content on a certificate and why it changes the arithmetic — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
VBEPAKJNHB+19 23 24k 14mo
Coming back to: Purity assay versus content assay: two different numbers
Purity assay versus content assay: two different numbers — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it anywhere. A…
PMDTAZOVEV+71 77 31k 23mo

Related topics — sharing the tags certificate of analysis, amino acid analysis, batch & lot numbers

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports
Counter-ion form: the field almost nobody reports Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
ANMBERFH 3 11k 2mo
What a certificate commits its issuer to — the long version
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What a certificate commits its issuer to — the long version A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a certificate in front…
OVLEJICLKP+20 26 21k 2d
When a tidy document is a signal and when it is decoration — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: When a tidy document is a signal and when it is decoration — does this still hold? A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
VAFKTDJN+3 7 22k 11mo
Revisiting: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis
Revisiting: A field-by-field walk through a certificate of analysis Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I…
HFRJPNEAPK+37 41 656 3mo
Water content on a certificate and why it changes the arithmetic
Water content on a certificate and why it changes the arithmetic — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A documentation question rather than an analytical one. I have a…
VBEPAKJNHB+19 23 24k 14mo