The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

SURMOUNT-4 and what withdrawal data does and does not tell an individual — one year on

This is a generated summary. It shows the 9 most-liked posts from a topic of 137, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
MM
m.mwangiTL2 Moderator18 Oct 2025#3

This follows post #2 rather than contradicting it.

Half-life difference: tirzepatide is about 5 days versus semaglutide's week-long. Practically, that means steady state is reached slightly faster and the post-dose swing is slightly larger. Most people do not report noticing the difference in practical terms.

27 likes 9mo
MD
m.dalgaardTL3Regular Solution18 Oct 2025#6

On post #2 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

Dual agonism versus dose: how much of tirzepatide's effect is the GIP component and how much is simply achieving higher receptor engagement? The honest answer is that the question is not settled. Some of the effect is surely the GIP component, but the trial design does not decompose it.

13 likes 9mo
NG
np_gilmoreTL3Nurse practitioner19 Oct 2025#13

Worth separating two things that post #9 runs together.

Storage and stability: published data on licensed tirzepatide formulations exists and is worth reading directly rather than through summarised claims. Reconstituted preparations in different diluents have not been studied and extrapolation from the licensed formulation is the best you can do.

28 likes 9mo
AS
a.salcedoTL3Regular20 Oct 2025#31
NLoughran, post #27: SURPASS-2 compared tirzepatide with semaglutide 1.0 mg, the licensed diabetes dose at that time. It did not compare with semaglutide 2.4 mg, the highest approved dose. That is the central and legitimate criticism of the head-to-head evidence and it is worth remembering when people quote the trial. Go to post

Worth separating two things that post #27 runs together.

Nausea profile: some people report tirzepatide as less nausea-prone than semaglutide, others report it as more. The trial reported gastrointestinal effects broadly comparable in character. Individual variation is the largest factor.

33 likes in reply to #27 9mo
MN
m.ndiayeTL2 Moderator20 Oct 2025#40
KAndersson, post #19: I read post #17 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing. The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough. Go to post

post #39 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

Nausea profile: some people report tirzepatide as less nausea-prone than semaglutide, others report it as more. The trial reported gastrointestinal effects broadly comparable in character. Individual variation is the largest factor.

32 likes in reply to #19 9mo
I
IHollingworthTL2Member21 Oct 2025#48

Coming back to post #46, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Mass and charge states: tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da and on an electrospray instrument you would expect to see charge states mostly in the 2+ to 4+ range, the same as semaglutide. A doubly charged species would appear at about (4813.5 + 2 × 1.008) / 2 ≈ 2408.

29 likes 9mo
JP
j.palaciosTL2 Moderator21 Oct 2025#56
JFitzgibbon, post #37: Mass and charge states: tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da and on an electrospray instrument you would expect to see charge states mostly in the 2+ to 4+ range, the same as semaglutide. A doubly charged species would appear at about (4813.5 + 2 × 1.008) / 2 ≈ 2408. Go to post

I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.

The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.

27 likes in reply to #37 9mo
GI
g.ibarraTL2 Moderator23 Oct 2025#94

Nausea profile: some people report tirzepatide as less nausea-prone than semaglutide, others report it as more. The trial reported gastrointestinal effects broadly comparable in character. Individual variation is the largest factor.

28 likes 9mo
G
GEldridgeTL3Regular24 Oct 2025#108

Nausea profile: some people report tirzepatide as less nausea-prone than semaglutide, others report it as more. The trial reported gastrointestinal effects broadly comparable in character. Individual variation is the largest factor.

30 likes 9mo

Read the full topic (137 posts)

This topic was closed 120 days after the last reply. Closing is automatic for quiet topics so that a settled answer does not collect new questions underneath it. If you have a follow-up, open a new topic and link back to this one — that keeps both readable and gives your question its own title.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters
The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016). Please…
BMRMAWSOML+119 136 5.6k 2mo
Tirzepatide molecular mass and the charge states you would expect on ESI — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Tirzepatide molecular mass and the charge states you would expect on ESI — does this still hold? Comparing STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) with…
TTARHMKRMC+7 11 281 6mo
About the Tirzepatide category
Dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist. SURPASS and SURMOUNT programme data, titration, and comparative discussion. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is…
SLTVDNSRM+2 6 132 13mo
[2026 update] What the GIP component of tirzepatide is thought to contribute, and how confident we can be
The question in the title: What the GIP component of tirzepatide is thought to contribute, and how confident we can be I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing STEP 4 (…
DSSBBDALCD+109 124 31k 10mo
Tirzepatide's shorter half-life and its one practical consequence
On the subject in the title: Tirzepatide's shorter half-life and its one practical consequence Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I…
RERMNECCB+18 29 20k 8mo

Related topics — sharing the tags SURMOUNT programme, randomised trial, tirzepatide

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
GIP receptor agonism and the argument about direction
GIP receptor agonism and the argument about direction — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise…
ACQZES 2 867 10mo
[2026 update] Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
NVAVRJVBV+5 9 4.2k 1d
A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis — what changed since
On the subject in the title: A claim built entirely on a subgroup analysis — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019) cited in support of a claim…
AWZCQZ 2 2k 18mo
A preprint whose numbers changed substantially at publication — what changed since
On the subject in the title: A preprint whose numbers changed substantially at publication — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it…
BARVKOESSS+3 7 125 8mo
Journal club: STEP-HFpEF and symptom endpoints — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Journal club: STEP-HFpEF and symptom endpoints — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) with STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) and…
EDCRFKTVIA+11 15 4k 10mo