Topic summary

Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection

Analytics › Home & field testing LOD & LOQ third-party testing ELISA

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 16, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.

h.espinozaTL2 Moderator30 Dec 2024#3

w.novak, post #2: the opening post is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Precision of home tests: most consumer-accessible devices are not precise to the level people want ("is this 99% pure or 97% pure"). They give a yes/no or a rough category, not a quantitative number. Go to post

Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.

The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.

31 likes in reply to #2 19mo

p.dialloTL2 Moderator12 Mar 2025 · edited#7

Coming back to post #5, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Immunoassay limitations: tests that use antibodies have cross-reactivity limitations. An antibody raised to semaglutide will cross-react to some degree with tirzepatide and other structurally similar compounds. The test result conflates them.

23 likes 17mo

z.okonkwoTL2 Moderator22 Jun 2025#14

Two things before anyone answers the substance.

First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.

18 likes 13mo

system_suitabilityTL3Analytical chemist6 Jul 2025#15

post #14 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

26 likes 13mo

j.moreauTL2 Moderator19 Jul 2025#16

y.mensah, post #6: What you can use home tests for: confirmation that a solution contains peptide (as opposed to being saline alone), rough screening for very different compounds (semaglutide versus totally unrelated compound). What you cannot use them for: precise purity assessment or verification that the identity is correct. Go to post

Enzyme assays: if you have an enzyme that reacts specifically with your compound, an enzyme-based assay can work. These are sometimes available commercially but are less common than antibody-based tests.

19 likes in reply to #6 12mo

Read the full topic (16 posts)

This topic was referenced in

Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful noAnalytics › Home & field testing · 56 replies

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no Analytics › Home & field testing ELISA LOD & LOQ documentation quality third-party testing Revisiting: Can a home kit substitute for a laboratory report? A careful no — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…	+50	56	9.8k	1d
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet Analytics › Home & field testing ELISA documentation quality LOD & LOQ Solved Pinned The question in the title: What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. A documentation question rather than an analytical…	+46	50	8k	6h
Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset Analytics › Home & field testing ELISA LOD & LOQ documentation quality Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I…	+75	82	17k	12h
A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial — does this still hold? Analytics › Home & field testing ELISA third-party testing LOD & LOQ documentation quality Solved A comparison of home results against a laboratory result on the same vial — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Working through the…	+2	6	15k	11h
Coming back to: Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches: the specificity problem Analytics › Home & field testing third-party testing LOD & LOQ documentation quality ELISA Solved On the subject in the title: Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches: the specificity problem Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…	+77	89	16k	9h

Related topics — sharing the tags LOD & LOQ, third-party testing, ELISA

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
What a documentation review can and cannot tell you — a second dataset Sourcing › Independent verification Janoshik Analytical VendorInvestigate blind sampling third-party testing The question in the title: What a documentation review can and cannot tell you — a second dataset I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I would like to talk about documentation…		4	170	4mo
Second pass at: Robustness: the parameters worth deliberately varying Analytics › Method validation linearity LOD & LOQ recovery system suitability On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Robustness: the parameters worth deliberately varying Working notes rather than a conclusion. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…	+61	66	9.5k	3mo
[2026 update] A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction Sourcing › Vendor reports batch & lot numbers third-party testing documentation quality certificate of analysis On the subject in the title: A report I filed that turned out to be wrong, and the correction Working notes rather than a conclusion. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…	+15	19	18k	2d
Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset Analytics › Home & field testing ELISA LOD & LOQ documentation quality Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to understand what this number means before I…	+75	82	17k	12h
Follow-up: Reporting a discrepancy without making an allegation Sourcing › Vendor reports certificate of analysis disputed third-party testing Janoshik Analytical Reporting a discrepancy without making an allegation Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Structured report rather than an opinion, following the format the…		2	24k	19mo