e.lehtinen
TL2 Moderator · Curitiba
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Curitiba.
Joined 16 January 2025 · last posted 2d · groups: regional-apac
83Posts here
1Topics
0Solutions
1.6kLikes received
1.6kLikes given
23Badges
214Days visited
5.3kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice Replied, post #77 · Outcomes › Body composition · 26 Jul 2026 · 0 likes This follows post #74 rather than contradicting it. For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add…
-
[2026 update] Antibiotics and a course of something with delayed emptying Replied, post #84 · Practice › Interactions · 24 Jul 2026 · 1 like Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own…
-
Comparing my trajectory with the trial curves, carefully — a second dataset Replied, post #78 · Outcomes › Progress reports · 20 Jul 2026 · 1 like Measurement noise: day-to-day body mass varies by more than a kilogram on hydration, glycogen, and gut contents alone. A weekly reading is a single noisy sample of a…
-
Follow-up: How compounding permissions changed when supply normalised Replied, post #42 · Sourcing › Regulatory · 19 Jul 2026 · 6 likes Primary documents matter: regulatory positions are published in official documents. Reading the regulatory agency's website directly is more reliable than reading a…
-
Coming back to: Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part Replied, post #110 · Evidence › Preprints · 19 Jul 2026 · 0 likes post #109 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Discussing preprints in this community: bring them in for early discussion, label them…
-
Alcohol: what is documented and what is folklore Replied, post #118 · Practice › Interactions · 18 Jul 2026 · 0 likes On post #114 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Alcohol: no absolute contraindication but it raises gastrointestinal irritation risk and this drug class…
-
Athletes in weight-category sports: a different risk calculus Replied, post #21 · Clinical › Special populations · 11 Jul 2026 · 24 likes Hepatic impairment: less is known about dosing in significant liver disease than in kidney disease. Extreme caution applies because the liver metabolises a large…
-
What to bring: records that a clinician can actually use — a second dataset Replied, post #16 · Clinical › Prescriber conversations · 8 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Preparing for an appointment: bring recent bloodwork, a list of current medications with doses and timing, and any questions written out. Written questions get better…
-
Follow-up: Prior authorisation: what the criteria usually require Replied, post #59 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 7 Jul 2026 · 0 likes This follows post #56 rather than contradicting it. Documentation your clinician can provide: letters from clinicians describing why standard treatments have failed or…
-
[2026 update] Interpreting a result that disagrees with the supplier's certificate Replied, post #63 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 4 Jul 2026 · 30 likes Picking up post #60: that is the part I would want checked first. Interpreting a result: a purity figure is one measurement on one vial on one day. Agreement across two…
-
GIP receptor agonism and the argument about direction — does this still hold? Replied, post #5 · Pharmacology › Receptor biology · 30 Jun 2026 · 1 like post #4 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Amylin receptor signalling: amylin promotes satiety and slows gastric emptying through a…
-
Coming back to: What the published dose-response for semaglutide actually looks like… Replied, post #28 · Compounds › Semaglutide · 26 Jun 2026 · 21 likes post #27 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. The STEP programme populations were selected: enrollment criteria required baseline…