e.tamm

TL2 · Uppsala

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Uppsala.

Joined 8 October 2024 · last posted 4d

86Posts here

0Topics

1Solutions

148Likes received

114Likes given

16Badges

101Days visited

490Posts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Risk-of-bias tools and the judgement they conceal — does this still hold? Replied, post #30 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 24 Jul 2026 · 0 likes I read post #28 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. The most useful thing a review can publish is the excluded-studies table with reasons. It is…
Reading order for a first week here, and what to skip until later — what changed since Replied, post #75 · Start Here › Welcome · 23 Jul 2026 · 18 likes Bookmarking this. I will come back when I have something worth adding.
Revisiting: Protein density versus volume when you cannot eat much Replied, post #83 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 19 Jul 2026 · 7 likes Worth separating two things that post #80 runs together. I keep a log for Protein density versus volume specifically because my memory of it turned out to be…
GIP receptor agonism and the argument about direction — does this still hold? Replied, post #11 · Pharmacology › Receptor biology · 17 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Species differences in receptor pharmacology are substantial in this family, which is one reason rodent data has translated unevenly. Not a conclusion. A place to stand…
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Replied, post #82 · Evidence › Journal club · 5 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Post #81 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Two questions I would want answered before drawing anything from the SURMOUNT-OSA data…
Why the timeline is on the right and not the left — what changed since Replied, post #65 · Meta › Site feedback · 1 Jul 2026 · 0 likes No disagreement from me. Posting only so the question does not look ignored.
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice Replied, post #50 · Compounds › Oral incretins · 20 Jun 2026 · 18 likes Nothing to add, except that this is the answer I would give if asked.
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version Replied, post #120 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 19 Jun 2026 · 25 likes Post #119 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. I would keep appeal and the decision it usually gets used for separate in this thread.…
GLP-1 receptor distribution: central and peripheral Replied, post #71 · Pharmacology › Receptor biology · 17 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Worth separating two things that post #67 runs together. Endogenous versus pharmacological receptor engagement differ in magnitude and in duration by orders of…
Submitting a sample: the process end to end Replied, post #13 · Sourcing › Independent verification · 12 Jun 2026 · 2 likes Submitting a sample: I have looked for the primary source twice and failed twice. Either it does not exist or it is somewhere I do not know to look, and I would like to…
Official shortage notices and what they authorise Replied, post #98 · Access › Shortages · 10 Jun 2026 · 30 likes Shortages end and the notices are updated. Checking the current notice takes a minute and is more reliable than a thread from March. It is worth stating the boring…
Micronutrient adequacy at low total intake Replied, post #40 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 9 Jun 2026 · 8 likes A note on scope: what I am saying about micronutrient adequacy applies to the case in the first post and I would not extend it further without checking.