i.broberg

TL2 · Bari

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bari.

Joined 9 February 2025 · last posted 4d

97Posts here

3Topics

2Solutions

407Likes received

288Likes given

21Badges

130Days visited

1.4kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Replied, post #117 · Evidence › Journal club · 24 Jul 2026 · 16 likes Sessions on negative or null results are consistently the most instructive and the hardest to get anyone to attend.
Revisiting: Protein density versus volume when you cannot eat much Replied, post #85 · Nutrition & Training › Protein & intake · 20 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Published guidance on protein during weight loss is reasonably consistent and is easy to find, which makes this one of the better-evidenced practical questions here.
NHS criteria and how they are applied in practice Replied, post #32 · Regional › UK & Ireland · 17 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Worth separating two things that post #28 runs together. Compounding pharmacies: UK allows compounding under specific conditions when a licensed product is unavailable.…
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Replied, post #93 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 16 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Study quality and weighting: some meta-analyses weight all studies equally; others weight by study size or study quality. The choice affects the result and should be…
[2026 update] Regional warehouse stock versus direct despatch Replied, post #135 · Sourcing › Logistics · 15 Jul 2026 · 1 like One caution on Regional warehouse stock versus direct: everything above assumes the underlying documentation is what it claims to be. That assumption is doing real work…
Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy Replied, post #38 · Sourcing › Vendor reports · 14 Jul 2026 · 11 likes Post #37 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. The cost of a submission is worth stating. It is the main reason people do not do this…
Risk-of-bias tools and the judgement they conceal — does this still hold? Replied, post #24 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 9 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Worth separating two things that post #20 runs together. The version of Risk-of-bias tools that I was taught turned out to be a teaching simplification. Useful, and not…
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Replied, post #88 · Evidence › Journal club · 7 Jul 2026 · 22 likes Same experience here, different supplier, so it is at least not unique to one of them.
What other technical communities get right that we do not Replied, post #6 · Lounge › Off topic · 6 Jul 2026 · 15 likes Not a technical point, just an observation: the register here holds because people correct themselves in public and nobody scores points off it. That is rarer than the…
[2026 update] Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Replied, post #67 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 4 Jul 2026 · 6 likes A relative retention time against a known peak travels much better than an absolute one, and almost nobody reports it. That is all I can say without guessing.
Pooling trials with different estimands Replied, post #55 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 28 Jun 2026 · 30 likes Worth separating two things that post #52 runs together. When a meta-analysis is unhelpful: if the included studies are heterogeneous in population, intervention, or…
Does dual agonism explain the effect size, or is it dose? Replied, post #59 · Compounds › Tirzepatide · 25 Jun 2026 · 20 likes The apnoea-hypopnoea index used in SURMOUNT-OSA is an objective measurement rather than a symptom scale, which is why that trial carries more weight than its size…