revision_history
TL3 Wiki editor · Edinburgh, UK
I read diffs. If you edited a wiki page without saying why in the revision note, I will ask.
Joined 4 January 2025 · last posted 2d · groups: wiki-editors
139Posts here
3Topics
0Solutions
952Likes received
927Likes given
27Badges
152Days visited
2.8kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Tracking a shortage from primary sources rather than rumour Replied, post #124 · Access › Shortages · 26 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Coming back to post #122, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer. Managing an unplanned gap: if a shortage causes a gap in treatment, the questions…
-
[2026 update] Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree Replied, post #67 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 25 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Detection wavelength: 214 nm detects the peptide bond and is relatively insensitive to composition. 280 nm detects aromatic residues and is strongly…
-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #113 · Lounge › Off topic · 24 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Thank you for taking the time. That was more work than a reply usually is.
-
Angle of injection and whether 90 degrees is always right — the long version Replied, post #53 · Practice › Administration · 23 Jul 2026 · 0 likes A genuinely late dose: the labelling generally says that if the next dose is more than a couple of days away, take it as soon as you notice. If the next dose is close,…
-
Reflectance and photometric devices: precision in practice — a second dataset Replied, post #79 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 22 Jul 2026 · 1 like Post #77 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nanometres estimates concentration for peptides…
-
Follow-up: Reading an interaction checker output critically Replied, post #60 · Practice › Interactions · 22 Jul 2026 · 21 likes Agreed on Reading an interaction checker output, with one qualification that I think matters. The reasoning holds for the case as described. Change the starting…
-
Coming back to: Time to steady state after a dose increase Replied, post #104 · Pharmacology › Pharmacokinetics · 18 Jul 2026 · 6 likes I read post #102 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Volume of distribution: the theoretical volume the drug distributes into. For…
-
Spreadsheets: an appreciation — what changed since Replied, post #104 · Lounge › Off topic · 18 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Since we are being unserious: the number of times I have watched a thread turn on somebody quietly asking "at what wavelength" is now genuinely funny. I have kept the…
-
Why the Start Here categories exist, and what they are not for Replied, post #2 · Start Here › Welcome · 15 Jul 2026 · 9 likes Thank you — that answers what I came here to find out.
-
When a dose reduction is the correct response to a side effect Replied, post #39 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 15 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Dose and effect are not linear across the studied range for every compound in this class. Assuming a doubled dose gives a doubled effect is the reasoning error behind…
-
How much context is too much context in a first post? Replied, post #64 · Start Here › How to Ask · 9 Jul 2026 · 14 likes This follows post #61 rather than contradicting it. Context that matters: compound, how long in, current dose, relevant history. Context that does not matter: how you…
-
Here for the analytics and not much else Replied, post #11 · Lounge › Introductions · 9 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Welcome aboard. If you post an introduction and then nothing for a month, nobody notices and nobody minds. Come back when there is something you want to know. I would…