t.lindqvist

TL2 · Galway

Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Galway.

Joined 20 January 2025 · last posted 4d

85Posts here

0Topics

0Solutions

563Likes received

528Likes given

17Badges

181Days visited

2.7kPosts read

Recent activity

Full stream

Reading order for a first week here, and what to skip until later — what changed since Replied, post #79 · Start Here › Welcome · 24 Jul 2026 · 24 likes Reading the guidelines before you post is genuinely worth the twenty minutes. Not because you will break one, but because the rules explain why the place reads the way…
What a certificate commits its issuer to Replied, post #90 · Analytics › COA interpretation · 23 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Asking for the batch record rather than the certificate is a reasonable request and the response to it is informative whichever way it goes. Filing this under things…
Revisiting: Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people… Replied, post #49 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 23 Jul 2026 · 0 likes I read post #48 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. Something worth flagging about absence of controlled human data: the strongest-sounding…
Revisiting: What pooling buys you and what it destroys Replied, post #91 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 14 Jul 2026 · 29 likes Small correction to my own earlier position on pooling buys. I had the units the wrong way round, which changes the conclusion by an order of magnitude and therefore…
Documenting a supplier's response to a discrepancy Replied, post #32 · Sourcing › Vendor reports · 7 Jul 2026 · 33 likes Seconded. It reads as careful rather than confident, which is the right register.
Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Replied, post #86 · Evidence › Journal club · 6 Jul 2026 · 1 like The figures usually contain the finding and the text usually contains the interpretation. Separating them for the first twenty minutes is a discipline worth keeping.…
Pooling trials with different estimands Replied, post #66 · Evidence › Meta-analyses · 2 Jul 2026 · 22 likes On post #62 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Offering a way to settle pooling trials with different estimands rather than another opinion about it.…
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #73 · Meta › Feature requests · 2 Jul 2026 · 21 likes Post #72 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit. Request with the use case rather than the feature. I frequently want every topic that…
[2026 update] Area percent versus weight percent: the confusion that causes most arguments Replied, post #65 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 30 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Post #64 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Area percent versus weight percent is a question about a distribution, not about a…
Second pass at: Programming during a large energy deficit Replied, post #48 · Nutrition & Training › Resistance training · 27 Jun 2026 · 14 likes I read post #47 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite. If someone has run Programming during a large energy properly I would rather read that than…
An appeal that succeeded, with the letter structure — the long version Replied, post #116 · Access › Insurance & coverage · 18 Jun 2026 · 0 likes Thank you — that answers what I came here to find out.
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice Replied, post #46 · Compounds › Oral incretins · 17 Jun 2026 · 5 likes PIONEER 6 is the cardiovascular outcome trial for oral semaglutide and it enrolled a diabetes population at high cardiovascular risk. Quoting it outside that population…