Second pass at: Programming during a large energy deficit posts 31–49
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to building again. The transition from preservation mode to building mode is real and worth planning.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Picking up post #31: that is the part I would want checked first.
Recovery: heavier training on a energy deficit and on a compound that slows gastric emptying requires attention to recovery (sleep, nutrition, stress). Recovery capacity declines with deficit, so training volume might need adjustment.
Maintenance is the goal: preserving lean mass and strength during weight loss is the goal of resistance training in this context, not building new muscle. That goal is usually achievable with consistent, moderate training.
I read post #35 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Adaptation and plateau: if strength does not change for weeks, that is stability, not backsliding. Expecting continuous progress during weight loss is unrealistic.
This follows post #35 rather than contradicting it.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
On post #35 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Deload weeks: periodic weeks (every 4 to 8 weeks) with reduced volume and intensity can help with recovery and sometimes reveal strength gains that got obscured by fatigue.
post #39 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Cardio and resistance: the interaction between energy-intense cardiovascular training and resistance training is real. Moderate cardio is fine; excessive endurance training can interfere with muscle maintenance.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
post #40 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
On post #38 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to building again. The transition from preservation mode to building mode is real and worth planning.
Programming while losing weight quickly: realistic expectations are crucial. Strength often stays surprisingly stable; power output might decline slightly. Expecting gains during an energy deficit sets yourself up for disappointment.
Recovery: heavier training on a energy deficit and on a compound that slows gastric emptying requires attention to recovery (sleep, nutrition, stress). Recovery capacity declines with deficit, so training volume might need adjustment.
post #44 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Maintenance is the goal: preserving lean mass and strength during weight loss is the goal of resistance training in this context, not building new muscle. That goal is usually achievable with consistent, moderate training.
Frequency: three sessions per week of full-body training is easier to maintain than higher frequencies on an energy deficit. Consistency beats intensity when recovery capacity is limited.
I read post #46 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Intensity: using weights that allow 6 to 12 reps before fatigue is a reasonable range for preserving muscle. Heavier weights with lower reps can work but require more recovery.
Volume: the number of sets per muscle group per week that supports muscle maintenance is roughly 12 to 18 hard sets. That varies by individual but gives a target range.
This topic was referenced in
- About the Resistance training categoryNutrition & Training › Resistance training · 4 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Progressive overload when the scale is falling Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a…
|
+4 | 8 | 14k | 8mo |
|
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold?
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Maintenance rather than loss,…
|
2 | 11k | 10mo | |
|
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports
On the subject in the title: Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method…
|
+27 | 31 | 22k | 20mo |
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
|
+152 | 167 | 6.6k | 21mo |
|
About the Resistance training category
Programming while losing weight quickly, realistic expectations, and recovery. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
|
4 | 40k | 17d |
Related topics — sharing the tags DXA, lean mass loss, fatigue
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Second pass at: Sodium, potassium and magnesium when intake drops
Second pass at: Sodium, potassium and magnesium when intake drops Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a…
|
+132 | 142 | 12k | 22mo |
|
Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale
Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the…
|
+1 | 5 | 34k | 8mo |
|
Coming back to: The nausea timeline across the first four weeks, with a tabulated log
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The nausea timeline across the first four weeks, with a tabulated log Everything below is what sits behind that. Reporting something rather than asking about it, in…
|
+42 | 49 | 576 | 17mo |
|
[2026 update] Whether protein timing matters at a large deficit
Whether protein timing matters at a large deficit — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is not a…
|
+4 | 8 | 46k | 7mo |
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Progressive overload when the scale is falling Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a…
|
+4 | 8 | 14k | 8mo |