t.vasquez
TL4 Moderator Moderator · Evidence · Barcelona, ES
Moderate the evidence categories and chair most journal club sessions. Trained in clinical epidemiology. I care more about whether a study could have answered the question than whether I like the answer.
Joined 18 May 2024 · last posted 11h · groups: staff, moderators, journal-club, trust-level-4
218Posts here
11Topics
0Solutions
1.8kLikes received
1.8kLikes given
38Badges
165Days visited
6.4kPosts read
Stated areas
Recent activity
Full stream-
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Replied, post #121 · Lounge › Off topic · 27 Jul 2026 · 0 likes On best-written scientific paper: the maintained page in the documentation commons covers the general case with citations and a review date, which is more reliable than…
-
The anatomy of a question that gets answered within an hour Replied, post #123 · Start Here › How to Ask · 23 Jul 2026 · 1 like Appreciated. The plain phrasing does more work here than a longer post would.
-
A site rotation scheme that is easy enough to actually follow Replied, post #122 · Practice › Administration · 23 Jul 2026 · 0 likes That is a fair summary of where the discussion has got to.
-
What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism Replied, post #65 · Compounds › Cagrilintide & amylin analogues · 21 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Right — I had this wrong and I am glad to have read it before it mattered.
-
Reading a home test result without over-claiming Replied, post #128 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 21 Jul 2026 · 26 likes Reconstitution behaviour is a legitimate home observation. A cake that will not dissolve, a solution that hazes, visible particulate — all are real information and all…
-
[2026 update] Detection wavelength and why 214 nm and 280 nm disagree Replied, post #53 · Analytics › HPLC & UHPLC · 20 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Change the wavelength and the proportions change even though the sample has not. That is the reason the wavelength has to be on the document for the number to mean…
-
Immortal time bias in a claims-database study — one year on Replied, post #29 · Evidence › Study critique · 18 Jul 2026 · 11 likes On Immortal time bias the community has more anecdote than the confidence in this thread implies, and I include my own contribution in that.
-
Reading a rodent study on a secretagogue without over-extrapolating — the long version Replied, post #44 · Compounds › Secretagogues & GH axis · 16 Jul 2026 · 4 likes Practical answer on Reading a rodent study, since the theoretical one is upthread: do the simplest check first, write down the result, and only then decide whether the…
-
Named, unnamed and unspecified impurities as regulatory categories — the long version Replied, post #79 · Analytics › Impurities & related substances · 15 Jul 2026 · 4 likes The related-substances total is only as informative as the method that generated it. Two per cent by a method that resolves everything is a different statement from two…
-
Revisiting: Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people… Replied, post #28 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 13 Jul 2026 · 4 likes This follows post #25 rather than contradicting it. The absence of adequately powered published randomised human trials is the central fact about BPC-157. This site…
-
How much context is too much context in a first post? Replied, post #61 · Start Here › How to Ask · 9 Jul 2026 · 2 likes Staff note on titles, since it comes up. We retitle topics fairly often, always leaving the original in the first post and always logging it. It is not a criticism of…
-
Request: a per-category review queue Replied, post #87 · Meta › Feature requests · 8 Jul 2026 · 7 likes Staff view: this is a good request and a larger one than it looks, because the citation is currently a link rather than a relationship. Recording it properly is the…