Skip to content

Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public

Outcomes · subcategory

Body composition

DXA, BIA, ultrasound and the precision of each. Lean mass preservation during rapid loss.

16 topics788 posts5 solved Moderators: owen.brady About this category

DXA bioimpedance lean mass loss data table

16 topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
About the Body composition category DXA bioimpedance lean mass loss Pinned Wiki DXA, BIA, ultrasound and the precision of each. Lean mass preservation during rapid loss. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…		5	64k	15mo
Lean mass preservation: what the evidence supports — does this still hold? bioimpedance lean mass loss data table DXA Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Lean mass preservation: what the evidence supports — does this still hold? What changes if the standard account of Lean mass preservation is wrong?…	+112	122	5.2k	20h
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice DXA data table lean mass loss Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Trying to establish the boundary conditions on ultrasound and skinfolds. The…	+72	76	2.7k	2d
Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves lean mass loss data table DXA bioimpedance Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin bioimpedance and hydration down and I want to set…	+62	70	13k	23d
Follow-up: Interpreting a composition change that is within the error bars DXA lean mass loss bioimpedance data table Solved Interpreting a composition change that is within the error bars Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about Interpreting a composition change directly,…		2	95	24d
Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves data table DXA bioimpedance Solved Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves Everything below is what sits behind that. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin Bioimpedance and…		2	2.8k	1mo
Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale lean mass loss data table bioimpedance DXA Solved On the subject in the title: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about measurement precision rather than about physiology. Two…	+18	26	9.4k	2mo
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since data table DXA bioimpedance lean mass loss Posting this under the heading it deserves: Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. What changes if the standard account of…	+32	37	7.4k	3mo
Second pass at: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate DXA lean mass loss data table Second pass at: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers on…	+64	68	13k	4mo
DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass bioimpedance data table DXA Closed Posting this under the heading it deserves: DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass Everything below is what sits behind that. A question about measurement precision rather than about…	+81	85	2.7k	7mo
Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale DXA bioimpedance lean mass loss data table Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about measurement precision…	+1	5	34k	8mo
DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — what changed since DXA data table lean mass loss bioimpedance Solved DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A question about measurement precision rather than about…		2	56k	11mo
Interpreting a composition change that is within the error bars bioimpedance data table lean mass loss On the subject in the title: Interpreting a composition change that is within the error bars Working notes rather than a conclusion. Asking about interpreting a composition change directly, because I have…	+18	22	5.8k	12mo
DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — the long version bioimpedance lean mass loss data table On the subject in the title: DXA precision and the least significant change for lean mass — the long version Working notes rather than a conclusion. A question about measurement precision rather than about…	+97	111	22k	14mo
Lean mass preservation: what the evidence supports lean mass loss bioimpedance DXA Lean mass preservation: what the evidence supports Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to work out what would count as evidence on lean mass preservation,…	+23	27	347	14mo
Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate bioimpedance data table DXA lean mass loss Solved Posting this under the heading it deserves: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate Everything below is what sits behind that. Working notes on circumference measurements rather than a…	+96	112	14k	23mo

Sponsored PeptideMeter — peptide analytics and supplier verificationPurity analysis and structured supplier verification, published as dated records rather than scores. Referenced throughout our sourcing documentation.View analytics →