What physical quantity does the device measure? A colorimetric or lateral-flow method typically responds to a class of chemistry rather than to a specific molecule. It can distinguish "peptide present" from "nothing present" but generally cannot distinguish the intended peptide from a closely related one.
Coming back to: Lateral-flow and colorimetric approaches: the specificity problem
post #6 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
What you can use home tests for: confirmation that a solution contains peptide (as opposed to being saline alone), rough screening for very different compounds (semaglutide versus totally unrelated compound). What you cannot use them for: precise purity assessment or verification that the identity is correct.
post #28 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Enzyme assays: if you have an enzyme that reacts specifically with your compound, an enzyme-based assay can work. These are sometimes available commercially but are less common than antibody-based tests.
Lateral-flow devices: like a rapid COVID test. They have a reagent strip and produce a colour result. They are quick but not precise and not intended for quantitative work.
I read post #48 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Precision of home tests: most consumer-accessible devices are not precise to the level people want ("is this 99% pure or 97% pure"). They give a yes/no or a rough category, not a quantitative number.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Lateral-flow devices: like a rapid COVID test. They have a reagent strip and produce a colour result. They are quick but not precise and not intended for quantitative work.
Molecular tests: DNA or RNA tests are not applicable to peptides, which do not contain nucleic acids. Peptide-specific tests rely on protein recognition, not nucleic-acid detection.
Read the full topic (90 posts)
This topic was referenced in
- Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitlyAnalytics › Home & field testing · 6 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would want from a home test that does not exist yet — what changed since Posting the method first, because I know what the first three…
|
+101 | 111 | 1.9k | 21h |
|
Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection
Why quantitation is the hard part, not detection I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies…
|
+11 | 15 | 27k | 12mo |
|
Second pass at: Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Second pass at: Cost versus information: making the trade-off explicitly Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I…
|
+23 | 27 | 6.1k | 22h |
|
Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since
On the subject in the title: Reading a home test result without over-claiming — what changed since Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked.…
|
2 | 12k | 6mo | |
|
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Posting the method first, because I know…
|
+117 | 131 | 45k | 10h |
Related topics — sharing the tags third-party testing, LOD & LOQ, documentation quality
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, range, robustness — with real criteria — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Working through the identity…
|
+53 | 58 | 7.5k | 6mo |
|
Repeatability versus intermediate precision
Repeatability versus intermediate precision — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
|
+119 | 134 | 34k | 13mo |
|
What a stability-indicating method is and how you demonstrate one
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What a stability-indicating method is and how you demonstrate one Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it checked. retatrutide…
|
4 | 57k | 6mo | |
|
A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims
On the subject in the title: A supplier that answers analytical questions with restated claims Working notes rather than a conclusion. A logistics question, since the answers here are usually better than…
|
+107 | 118 | 45k | 12mo |
|
Documentation that appears only after payment
Documentation that appears only after payment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to talk about documentation quality as a signal, separately from…
|
+113 | 124 | 13k | 7mo |