Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
Cardio and resistance: the interaction between energy-intense cardiovascular training and resistance training is real. Moderate cardio is fine; excessive endurance training can interfere with muscle maintenance.
Deload weeks: periodic weeks (every 4 to 8 weeks) with reduced volume and intensity can help with recovery and sometimes reveal strength gains that got obscured by fatigue.
post #64 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Recovery: heavier training on a energy deficit and on a compound that slows gastric emptying requires attention to recovery (sleep, nutrition, stress). Recovery capacity declines with deficit, so training volume might need adjustment.
On post #62 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
Frequency: three sessions per week of full-body training is easier to maintain than higher frequencies on an energy deficit. Consistency beats intensity when recovery capacity is limited.
Cardio and resistance: the interaction between energy-intense cardiovascular training and resistance training is real. Moderate cardio is fine; excessive endurance training can interfere with muscle maintenance.
Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to building again. The transition from preservation mode to building mode is real and worth planning.
Volume: the number of sets per muscle group per week that supports muscle maintenance is roughly 12 to 18 hard sets. That varies by individual but gives a target range.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
On post #69 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Maintenance is the goal: preserving lean mass and strength during weight loss is the goal of resistance training in this context, not building new muscle. That goal is usually achievable with consistent, moderate training.
post #73 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Adaptation and plateau: if strength does not change for weeks, that is stability, not backsliding. Expecting continuous progress during weight loss is unrealistic.
Programming while losing weight quickly: realistic expectations are crucial. Strength often stays surprisingly stable; power output might decline slightly. Expecting gains during an energy deficit sets yourself up for disappointment.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Resistance training category
Programming while losing weight quickly, realistic expectations, and recovery. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
|
4 | 40k | 17d | |
|
Follow-up: Recovery when intake is low: what to cut first
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Recovery when intake is low: what to cut first Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a…
|
+36 | 40 | 38k | 20mo |
|
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly Everything below is what sits behind that. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
+60 | 70 | 38k | 4mo |
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
|
+152 | 167 | 6.6k | 21mo |
|
Progressive overload when the scale is falling
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Progressive overload when the scale is falling Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a…
|
+4 | 8 | 14k | 8mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sleep tracking data and its considerable limitations
Sleep tracking data and its considerable limitations — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published trials in this…
|
+109 | 126 | 61k | 9mo |
|
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — what changed since
A 40-week log with the measurement method stated — what changed since Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a…
|
+9 | 13 | 2.1k | 9h |
|
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly Everything below is what sits behind that. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
+60 | 70 | 38k | 4mo |
|
Whether protein timing matters at a large deficit
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Whether protein timing matters at a large deficit Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a…
|
+29 | 33 | 7.7k | 4mo |
|
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports — a second dataset
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports — a second dataset — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this…
|
+28 | 32 | 579 | 2y |