Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides

Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable.

Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.

Something adjacent that I have been thinking about and that does not belong in any of the technical categories. No question in particular; I am interested in how other people see it.

Community culture: introductions give you a sense of who is here. Reading a few introduces you to the people and the tone of the community.

No spam: introductions are not a place to advertise commercial products or services. That is a rules violation.

I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.

The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.

I read post #3 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Following up: if you introduce yourself and someone asks a follow-up question, you can reply here or in a direct message depending on what feels right.

Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.