The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 29, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
HA
h.agyemanTL2 Moderator15 Mar 2026#11
j.bhattacharya, post #6: Two things before anyone answers the substance. First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound. Go to post

STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically.

21 likes in reply to #6 4mo
AV
a.vukovicTL2 Moderator17 Apr 2026#15
lyophil_margin, post #9: Critical appraisal template: (1) What did the trial set out to estimate? (2) Could the design answer that question? (3) Was the population sufficiently similar to your population to apply the results? (4) What was the absolute effect, not just the relative one? (5) What are the two strongest criticisms available? Go to post

SOUL (N Engl J Med 2025): Oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes. Extends the cardiovascular evidence to the oral formulation. Note that oral bioavailability is lower and more variable than injectable.

28 likes in reply to #9 3mo
YR
y.ramosTL2 Moderator8 Jun 2026#22
m.yildiz, post #10: Session format: read the paper before posting. The discussion is much better when everyone has. Start with the estimand and population, then methods, then results, then limitations. That order makes critique coherent. Go to post

I read post #20 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

STEP 1 (N Engl J Med 2021): The pivotal obesity trial for semaglutide and the reference point for most subsequent comparison. Mean weight reduction was substantially larger than anything previously achieved pharmacologically.

30 likes in reply to #10 2mo
G
GDashwoodTL3Regular30 Jun 2026#25

Picking up post #22: that is the part I would want checked first.

SURMOUNT-1 (N Engl J Med 2022): Tirzepatide obesity trial. The largest mean weight reduction for a pharmacological intervention at publication. Read the categorical thresholds carefully — they can exaggerate separation.

21 likes 28d
BP
b.petrovTL2 Moderator27 Jul 2026#29

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

28 likes 15h

Read the full topic (29 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
On the subject in the title: Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before posting; the…
NAFPALVSFT+114 125 2.5k 23h
Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024) with SCALE ( N Engl J…
CIRCBPMN+47 51 617 16mo
[2026 update] Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session
Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
NVAVRJVBV+5 9 4.2k 1d
Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question
Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support…
KBLKSSJLB+120 132 13k 1d
Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Comparing STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) with SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med ,…
GKRCDALB+70 76 4.8k 15h

Related topics — sharing the tags randomised trial, journal club, effect size

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
What the published dose-response for semaglutide actually looks like above 2.4 mg
What the published dose-response for semaglutide actually looks like above 2.4 mg — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA ,…
FEFTRW 2 10k 3mo
The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015). Please read it…
YMNSMH 2 7.1k 9h
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper
Journal club: the retatrutide phase 2 obesity paper — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
LFVDAERASV+7 11 33k 7mo
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice — does this still hold?
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice — does this still hold? Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019).…
MVEBATJSI+98 106 3.1k 10mo
Comparing the STEP programme populations: who was actually enrolled
Comparing the STEP programme populations: who was actually enrolled Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with FLOW ( N…
LVBPNN 2 7.5k 2mo