The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Data & Tools · Datasets

Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem

Solved
Solved by l.dziedzic in post #2
Reproducibility: if sharing data, include enough context (compound, dose, timeframe, method) that someone reading it understands what it represents.

Jump to the accepted answer →

BV
b.vanheckeTL2 Moderator26 Aug 2024#1

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem Everything below is what sits behind that.

Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.

  • Column: C18, 2.1 x 100 mm, 1.7 um
  • Mobile phase: 0.1% TFA in water / 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile
  • Gradient: 8% to 62% organic over 33 minutes
  • Detection: 220 nm
  • Injection: 6 uL
  • Sample: retatrutide, reconstituted to 1.0 mg/mL, injected within an hour

The main peak integrates at 98.2% of total area. There is a small feature on the trailing edge that I cannot decide is a shoulder or a baseline artefact, and that is what I am actually asking about.

6 likes 23mo
LD
l.dziedzicTL2 Moderator Solution31 Oct 2024#2

Reproducibility: if sharing data, include enough context (compound, dose, timeframe, method) that someone reading it understands what it represents.

11 likes 21mo
NL
n.lehtinenTL2 Moderator18 Dec 2024#3
b.vanhecke, post #1: Posting this under the heading it deserves: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be. Column: C18, 2.1 x 100 mm, 1.7 um Mobile phase: 0.1% TFA in water / 0.1% TFA in acetonitrile Gradient: 8%… Go to post

Temporal bias: older data in a dataset might reflect conditions (supplier, formulation, context) that have changed. Newer data is more current.

31 likes in reply to #1 19mo
AI
a.ibarraTL2 Moderator29 Jan 2025#4

I read the opening post twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

How to contribute: if you have longitudinal data you want to add, the format is simple: date, measurement, context. Contact the maintainer of the specific dataset.

0 likes 18mo
EK
e.kimaniTL2 Moderator10 Mar 2025 · edited#5

I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.

The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.

6 likes 17mo
SS
s.silvaTL2 Moderator16 Apr 2025#6

Limitations of datasets: all community-collected data has limitations. The population is self-selected (people in this community are not representative of all people using these compounds). Reporting bias is real (remarkable outcomes get reported; mundane outcomes do not).

16 likes 15mo

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Aggregated purity results across four services, with caveats Everything below is what sits behind that. Working through the identity arithmetic and I would like it…
CPEKLMHK 3 24k 9mo
Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy
Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
CAMFSRDNEM+65 71 839 5mo
About the Datasets category
Community-collected datasets, their collection methods, and their limitations. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
BNOFSVPSAA+6 11 42k 12mo
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem
Revisiting: Sample size in a voluntary survey: the selection problem — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies…
RAZAR 2 56k 9mo
Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Cleaning a self-reported dataset and what you throw away — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting the method first, because I know…
HMSCPW 2 2k 1h

Related topics — sharing the tags observational data, data table, site feedback

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157
Oral versus injected administration claims for BPC-157 — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen FLOW ( N Engl J Med , 2024) cited in support of a claim I do not think…
RMAAMMRST+20 24 47k 4mo
Tag proliferation and whether we should prune
On the subject in the title: Tag proliferation and whether we should prune Working notes rather than a conclusion. Process question about how this site works. I have read the guidelines and the trust-level…
ALADAW 2 11k 11mo
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold?
The question in the title: BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I have seen…
ASBSMCSBLS+6 10 3.1k 1d
Revisiting: Mobile reading experience on long topics
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Mobile reading experience on long topics Everything below is what sits behind that. Nominating something for promotion into the documentation commons.…
DSELKKHNJE+11 15 34k 10h
Waist circumference technique and its repeatability
Waist circumference technique and its repeatability — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes…
RFBDNKDOCT+55 60 11k 5mo