The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose in the sense that weight loss is minimal at that dose. It is a tolerance-testing dose. Confusing the purpose of a starting dose with the purpose of a maintenance dose leads to false conclusions about efficacy.
The 2.5 mg starting dose is not a therapeutic dose — why that matters posts 121–137
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Two things before anyone answers the substance.
First, the context in the first post is clear and specific. Second, the question is framed so that an answer can actually address it. Both are the norm here and both matter more than they sound.
post #122 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Nausea profile: some people report tirzepatide as less nausea-prone than semaglutide, others report it as more. The trial reported gastrointestinal effects broadly comparable in character. Individual variation is the largest factor.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
On post #120 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Storage and stability: published data on licensed tirzepatide formulations exists and is worth reading directly rather than through summarised claims. Reconstituted preparations in different diluents have not been studied and extrapolation from the licensed formulation is the best you can do.
SURMOUNT-OSA is notable because it used an objective physiological endpoint, the apnoea-hypopnoea index, rather than a symptom scale. Two parallel trials, with and without positive airway pressure, addressed the confounder directly. The reduction was substantial in both.
Dual agonism versus dose: how much of tirzepatide's effect is the GIP component and how much is simply achieving higher receptor engagement? The honest answer is that the question is not settled. Some of the effect is surely the GIP component, but the trial design does not decompose it.
post #126 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Titration schedules for tirzepatide have more dose steps than semaglutide partly because the compound is more potent and partly because the clinical programme used a finer gradation. That does not mean you cannot escalate on a coarser schedule if that suits you — the published schedule is not a lower bound.
SURMOUNT-4 used a randomised withdrawal design: everyone titrated, then those on maintenance were randomised to continue or placebo. Continuation maintained effect; withdrawal was followed by regain. The finding is robust but it says nothing about a lower effective maintenance dose, because that was not studied.
SURMOUNT-1 reported weight reduction of a magnitude that was the largest for a pharmacological intervention at that time of publication. It also reported a clear dose response across three doses. The categorical thresholds (people reaching 10%, 15%, 20% loss) got the most attention but read less informatively than the mean weight change.
Coming back to post #128, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Mass and charge states: tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da and on an electrospray instrument you would expect to see charge states mostly in the 2+ to 4+ range, the same as semaglutide. A doubly charged species would appear at about (4813.5 + 2 × 1.008) / 2 ≈ 2408.
The GIP component: GIP receptor agonism is thought to amplify the GLP-1 effect on satiety and energy expenditure, but how much of tirzepatide's effect is that and how much is simply achieving higher receptor occupancy remains genuinely open. The mechanistic literature is active.
Half-life difference: tirzepatide is about 5 days versus semaglutide's week-long. Practically, that means steady state is reached slightly faster and the post-dose swing is slightly larger. Most people do not report noticing the difference in practical terms.
Coming back to post #131, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
SURPASS-2 compared tirzepatide with semaglutide 1.0 mg, the licensed diabetes dose at that time. It did not compare with semaglutide 2.4 mg, the highest approved dose. That is the central and legitimate criticism of the head-to-head evidence and it is worth remembering when people quote the trial.
Picking up post #131: that is the part I would want checked first.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Half-life difference: tirzepatide is about 5 days versus semaglutide's week-long. Practically, that means steady state is reached slightly faster and the post-dose swing is slightly larger. Most people do not report noticing the difference in practical terms.
I read post #135 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Mass and charge states: tirzepatide is about 4813.5 Da and on an electrospray instrument you would expect to see charge states mostly in the 2+ to 4+ range, the same as semaglutide. A doubly charged species would appear at about (4813.5 + 2 × 1.008) / 2 ≈ 2408.
This topic was referenced in
- Revisiting: Why tirzepatide titration schedules have more steps than semaglutide'sCompounds › Tirzepatide · 101 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tirzepatide in type 2 diabetes: the SURPASS programme, summarised honestly
Tirzepatide in type 2 diabetes: the SURPASS programme, summarised honestly — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with STEP 2 ( Lancet ,…
|
+150 | 163 | 22k | 11mo |
|
[2026 update] Comparing tirzepatide and semaglutide is harder than the tables suggest
Comparing tirzepatide and semaglutide is harder than the tables suggest Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Comparing SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) with SURMOUNT-1…
|
2 | 23k | 21mo | |
|
SURPASS-2 and the comparator dose question that will not go away — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: SURPASS-2 and the comparator dose question that will not go away — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: STEP 8 ( JAMA ,…
|
+2 | 6 | 5.5k | 7h |
|
Tirzepatide molecular mass and the charge states you would expect on ESI
Tirzepatide molecular mass and the charge states you would expect on ESI Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited…
|
+36 | 40 | 44k | 11mo |
|
Tirzepatide storage and stability: what is published versus what is assumed — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Tirzepatide storage and stability: what is published versus what is assumed — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Comparing…
|
+15 | 19 | 930 | 18mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags SURPASS programme, SURMOUNT programme, effect size
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Semaglutide in people without diabetes: what the evidence base looks like
Semaglutide in people without diabetes: what the evidence base looks like Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016).…
|
+2 | 6 | 18k | 17mo |
|
Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part
Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Session topic: SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016). Please…
|
+38 | 42 | 863 | 22mo |
|
Why semaglutide's albumin binding is the whole reason weekly dosing works
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Why semaglutide's albumin binding is the whole reason weekly dosing works Session topic: SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023). Please read it before…
|
2 | 63k | 5mo | |
|
Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components
On the subject in the title: Reading a combination trial: attributing effect to components Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019). Please read it before…
|
4 | 19k | 11mo | |
|
Coming back to: Amylin analogue mechanism: satiety signalling separate from GLP-1
On the subject in the title: Amylin analogue mechanism: satiety signalling separate from GLP-1 Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I…
|
+27 | 31 | 671 | 12mo |