Evidence topics tagged estimand

Journal club: indirect comparison between two programmes, defended and attacked Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Trying to work out what would count as…

Journal club: LEADER as the historical anchor Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. What changes if the standard account of LEADER is wrong? I ask because I have…

Second pass at: Reading a trial's population section before its results Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Reading STEP 1 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) for the…

On the subject in the title: Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters — one year on Working notes rather than a conclusion. A follow-up question about Primary endpoint hierarchies that I did not…

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: STEP 8 and the fairness of the comparator dose — a second dataset Everything below is what sits behind that. Posting a small dataset on STEP 8. It is…

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: semaglutide in MASH, and surrogate endpoints Everything below is what sits behind that. Working notes on semaglutide in MASH rather than a conclusion.…

Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: Journal club: STEP 1 and the treatment-policy estimand — does this still hold? Working notes on STEP 1 rather than a conclusion. I would rather…

On the subject in the title: Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. CagriSema phase 2 combination paper — I have the observation and I do not trust my…

Subgroup analyses: pre-specified versus discovered — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I would like to disagree carefully with the settled view on subgroup analyses, and I…

Journal club: what we got wrong in an earlier session — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim is the thing circulating.…

On the subject in the title: Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reading SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) for the population rather than the effect,…

Journal club: orforglipron phase 2 and the non-peptide question Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Orforglipron phase 2, and specifically the version of it that…

Revisiting: Journal club: SURMOUNT-OSA and a hard endpoint in a soft field — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Collecting what is known about SURMOUNT-OSA in one place,…

Journal club: FLOW and the renal composite, component by component Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about what the numbers mean rather than what…

Interim analyses and stopping rules Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about interim analyses and stopping rules on behalf of the question I keep seeing…

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: STEP 3 and the intensive behavioural therapy floor Everything below is what sits behind that. Two things I would like separated before anyone answers…

On the subject in the title: Run-in periods and the population they select Working notes rather than a conclusion. An honest uncertainty about run-in periods rather than a disguised assertion. I do not know…

Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about what the numbers mean rather than what they…

On the subject in the title: Journal club: SELECT, absolute risk, and how it was reported — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on SELECT. It is mine, it is…

On the subject in the title: Reading a trial's population section before its results Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reading STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021) for the population rather than the effect, which I…

On the subject in the title: Adjudicated events and why the definition matters Working notes rather than a conclusion. A follow-up question about adjudicated events that I did not know to ask the first time.…

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters Everything below is what sits behind that. I was wrong about Primary endpoint hierarchies in a thread…

On the subject in the title: Subgroup analyses: pre-specified versus discovered — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting a small dataset on Subgroup analyses. It is mine, it is…

Primary endpoint hierarchies and why order matters Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I was wrong about primary endpoint hierarchies in a thread last spring and…

On the subject in the title: Composite endpoints and the component doing the work Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) with SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021) and…

What a statistical analysis plan adds that the paper does not I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. A follow-up question about statistical analysis plan…

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Open-label extensions: what survives and what does not Everything below is what sits behind that. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin open-label extensions down…

Run-in periods and the population they select — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A narrow question about Run-in periods, deliberately narrow,…

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: PIONEER 6 as a safety trial Everything below is what sits behind that. Reading PIONEER 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2019) for the population rather than the…

Journal club: PIONEER 6 as a safety trial Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Bringing a claim rather than a paper, because the claim is the thing circulating.…