m.ekstrom
TL2 Moderator · Utrecht
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Utrecht.
Joined 14 February 2025 · last posted 21h
68Posts here
1Topics
0Solutions
1.1kLikes received
633Likes given
20Badges
210Days visited
4kPosts read
Recent activity
Full stream-
Publication patterns in the BPC-157 literature, examined Replied, post #46 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 27 Jul 2026 · 10 likes On post #42 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. For anyone arriving from search engines: this subcategory discusses published preclinical work and the…
-
Stepping down deliberately, and how to do it without losing progress — what changed since Replied, post #96 · Practice › Dosing & titration · 25 Jul 2026 · 0 likes Titrating on tolerability rather than on the calendar: some people escalate when they tolerate a dose well, others escalate on the prescribed schedule regardless. The…
-
eGFR fluctuation and the creatinine denominator problem — the long version Replied, post #9 · Clinical › Bloodwork · 17 Jul 2026 · 12 likes Fasting state: some lab tests require fasting; others do not. Lipids on a fasting draw differ from lipids on a fed draw. Always note whether the test was fasting when…
-
Revisiting: Why the absence of controlled human data on BPC-157 matters more than people… Replied, post #36 · Compounds › Repair & healing peptides · 17 Jul 2026 · 4 likes TB-500 is usually the 7-residue actin-binding fragment of thymosin beta-4, not the full 43-residue protein. The two are routinely conflated in supplier documentation…
-
Common supplements people ask about, assessed one at a time Replied, post #55 · Practice › Interactions · 16 Jul 2026 · 12 likes For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.
-
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset Replied, post #83 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 14 Jul 2026 · 21 likes Why third-party testing is stronger: a home test run by the person who made the compound is a self-selected result. The test run by a neutral third party removes…
-
What consumer-accessible tests can and cannot determine — a second dataset Replied, post #62 · Analytics › Home & field testing · 7 Jul 2026 · 3 likes Precision of home tests: most consumer-accessible devices are not precise to the level people want ("is this 99% pure or 97% pure"). They give a yes/no or a rough…
-
A structured critique template this community uses — a second dataset Replied, post #29 · Evidence › Study critique · 5 Jul 2026 · 0 likes post #28 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Confounding: in observational data, is there a third variable that explains the…
-
Alcohol: what is documented and what is folklore Replied, post #83 · Practice › Interactions · 29 Jun 2026 · 25 likes Picking up post #80: that is the part I would want checked first. Supplements and herbs: many have no established interaction. Some do. If you are taking something…
-
Mass error in ppm: the arithmetic and the caveat — a second dataset Replied, post #12 · Analytics › Mass spectrometry · 23 Jun 2026 · 20 likes Purity and identity are different questions: LC-MS establishes that the species at a retention time has the expected mass. It does not establish how much of the sample…
-
Request: tag synonyms surfaced in search Replied, post #5 · Meta › Feature requests · 23 Jun 2026 · 2 likes Use case: explain why you think the feature would help. "I would use this to..." makes the request concrete.
-
[2026 update] Are there stupid questions here? A staff answer, at length Replied, post #41 · Start Here › Welcome · 19 Jun 2026 · 19 likes Nothing here requires expertise. The experienced members here got that way by posting questions, not by knowing the answer before they showed up. If you know something…