Manufacturer assistance programmes and their eligibility rules posts 31–43
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Insurance tier placement: a compound might be covered but on a higher tier (higher copay). Moving to a lower tier usually requires prior authorization or documented failure of cheaper alternatives.
Worth separating two things that post #29 runs together.
Subscription services and subscriptions: some online clinics bundle compounds into subscription models with different pricing. Understanding the terms before committing matters.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Biosimilars and future generics: as patents expire, biosimilar and generic versions might become available and prices might fall. That has already happened for some proteins; incretin agonist pricing might follow.
Pharmacy acquisition cost: a pharmacy pays less than the patient pays, even at insurance rates. That margin is where the pharmacy's costs and profit live.
On post #33 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Cost per milligram is the only comparison that survives format differences, but even then it needs care. A pen and a vial are not the same product and cannot be compared on price per milligram alone because dead volume, wastage, and number of doses actually obtainable differ.
post #37 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
I read post #37 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
List prices versus negotiated prices: the price a pharmaceutical company publishes and the price an insurance company or pharmacy actually pays differ substantially. List price is not what anyone pays.
Coming back to post #40, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Discount programmes and coupons: manufacturers often offer coupons that reduce out-of-pocket costs if insurance is not covering or is covering at a high copay. These have eligibility restrictions but can save money.
post #42 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.
Insurance tier placement: a compound might be covered but on a higher tier (higher copay). Moving to a lower tier usually requires prior authorization or documented failure of cheaper alternatives.
This topic was referenced in
- About the Pricing categoryAccess › Pricing · 5 replies
- Comparing prices across jurisdictions without misleading yourselfAccess › Pricing · 83 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[2026 update] Comparing prices across jurisdictions without misleading yourself
On the subject in the title: Comparing prices across jurisdictions without misleading yourself Working notes rather than a conclusion. Documenting an access outcome, dated, because everything in this category…
|
2 | 809 | 23h | |
|
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats — a second dataset
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats — a second dataset Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail…
|
2 | 27k | 13mo | |
|
Pen wastage and its effect on real cost
Pen wastage and its effect on real cost Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what determines…
|
+29 | 33 | 19k | 21mo |
|
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats — the long version
Cost per milligram, computed honestly across formats — the long version Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A coverage question with the paperwork detail…
|
+111 | 124 | 24k | 14mo |
|
Cost per delivered dose, which is the number that matters
Cost per delivered dose, which is the number that matters — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
+54 | 59 | 30k | 4mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags formulary, data table, compounding
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy
Contributing data without breaching anyone's privacy Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to understand what this number means before I repeat it…
|
+65 | 71 | 839 | 5mo |
|
Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: Coverage for the indication versus for the drug — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…
|
+46 | 50 | 41k | 16mo |
|
[2026 update] Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here
On the subject in the title: Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is…
|
2 | 11k | 8mo | |
|
Second pass at: Coverage in the US: a map of the usual obstacles
On the subject in the title: Second pass at: Coverage in the US: a map of the usual obstacles Working notes rather than a conclusion. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is what…
|
4 | 62k | 9mo | |
|
Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: Bioimpedance and hydration: why the number moves Everything below is what sits behind that. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number…
|
2 | 2.8k | 1mo |