The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Compounds · Oral incretins · continued

Oral semaglutide bioavailability and its variability between people — a second dataset posts 151–155

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.

MN
m.nascimentoTL2 Moderator29 Dec 2024#151

On post #147 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

PIONEER programme is phase 3 for oral semaglutide. The trials cover multiple indications and durations. Reading them requires attention to which trial is which because they are not all the same question.

12 likes 19mo
AF
a.finnegan_rdTL2Dietitian29 Dec 2024#152
impurity_table, post #75: Trial adherence in an oral trial with strict administration requirements is genuinely worse than trial-published data often suggests. That is why the exposure variability in oral formulations is mentioned repeatedly in the discussions here. Go to post

For anyone arriving from a search: the marked solution above is the direct answer, and the replies underneath it add the caveats that make it safe to use.

4 likes in reply to #75 19mo
AI
a.ilungaTL2 Moderator29 Dec 2024#153

SNAC is the sodium N-(8-[2-hydroxybenzoyl]amino) caprylate, an absorption enhancer that transiently raises local pH in the stomach and promotes gastric mucosal absorption. Without it, oral bioavailability of semaglutide would be too low for clinically useful dosing.

0 likes 19mo
CL
coldchain_liuTL3Regular29 Dec 2024#154

Picking up post #151: that is the part I would want checked first.

Trial adherence in an oral trial with strict administration requirements is genuinely worse than trial-published data often suggests. That is why the exposure variability in oral formulations is mentioned repeatedly in the discussions here.

25 likes 19mo
HV
h.vargaTL229 Dec 2024#155
This topic was closed 180 days after the last reply. Closing is automatic for quiet topics so that a settled answer does not collect new questions underneath it. If you have a follow-up, open a new topic and link back to this one — that keeps both readable and gives your question its own title.
Moved from Secretagogues & GH axis by t.vasquez. Category placement is not obvious from outside and getting it wrong is expected. This topic will get better answers here. The move is recorded in the public log citing R7.

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice
Why fasting instructions for oral semaglutide are not optional advice I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016)…
HFGHNNJAS+70 74 1.1k 23d
Orforglipron as a non-peptide: what changes when the molecule is small
On the subject in the title: Orforglipron as a non-peptide: what changes when the molecule is small Working notes rather than a conclusion. Comparing SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA ,…
SCBFCSDBZI+26 30 26k 23mo
The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes
Posting this under the heading it deserves: The SOUL trial and oral semaglutide cardiovascular outcomes Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015). Please read it…
YMNSMH 2 7.1k 9h
PIONEER 6 cardiovascular safety, read as a safety trial rather than an efficacy one — does this still hold?
PIONEER 6 cardiovascular safety, read as a safety trial rather than an efficacy one — does this still hold? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Session…
CAMMMLRRM+23 27 4.8k 22mo
Oral versus injectable exposure: comparing apples to a different fruit
Oral versus injectable exposure: comparing apples to a different fruit — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA ,…
JMMBCBJNNM+19 23 332 8mo

Related topics — sharing the tags randomised trial, PIONEER programme, SOUL trial

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since
Journal club: how we handle discontinuation in obesity trials — what changed since — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it…
OVFVIISLJB+14 18 35k 8mo
Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper
On the subject in the title: Journal club: the CagriSema phase 2 combination paper Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022) cited in support of a claim I do not…
PFKMM 2 329 21h
Oral versus injectable exposure: comparing apples to a different fruit
Oral versus injectable exposure: comparing apples to a different fruit — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Comparing SURMOUNT-2 ( Lancet , 2023) with SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA ,…
JMMBCBJNNM+19 23 332 8mo
Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal
On the subject in the title: Journal club: SUSTAIN 6 and its retinopathy signal Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have seen SELECT ( N Engl J Med , 2023) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
LAMRZHOJI+110 122 46k 1d
Tirzepatide storage and stability: what is published versus what is assumed
On the subject in the title: Tirzepatide storage and stability: what is published versus what is assumed Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read…
APPOELIGR+17 21 17k 12d