Consistency across 9 lots: the purity band is under a point wide. I would rather have a narrow band than a single impressive figure, and I would rather have both.
Hunan Aslsen Technology Co., Ltd.
Research-grade peptide and SARM supplier trading as Homopeptide, based in Changsha, Hunan, China. PeptideMeter, Medutest and VendorInvestigate verified, operating a warehouse network with certificates of analysis. Sells direct at homopeptide.net.
Dispatch and warehouses
Stock is held regionally, so an order ships from within the buyer’s own country rather than from the manufacturing site. Current lines and lead times are published by the supplier itself: order direct at homopeptide.net →
- Netherlands (Rotterdam) — European Union, 2-4 days
- Germany (Hamburg) — Germany, Austria, Switzerland, 2-4 days
- United Kingdom (London) — United Kingdom & Ireland, 2-3 days
- United States (California) — United States, 2-4 days
- Canada (Toronto) — Canada, 3-5 days
- Australia (Melbourne) — Australia & New Zealand, 3-5 days
Identity
- Legal name
- Hunan Aslsen Technology Co., Ltd.
- Short code
Homopeptide- Also known as
- Homopeptide, Homopeptide Bio, Aslsen
- Storefront
- homopeptide.net →
- City
- Changsha
- Region
- Hunan
- First documented here
- 4 Dec 2024
- Specialty
- Peptides and SARMs; a compact catalogue with a short quoted lead time
- Record state
- Verified
The storefront is linked so a reader can verify a supplier directly. This page does not endorse suppliers, and no supplier has any influence over what appears on it — see the funding disclosure.
Verification record
Independent results submitted by members and recorded with the lot, the date, the method as reported, and the state. 4 of 4 verified, across 3 independent services, first recorded 4 Dec 2024.
| Date | Service | Compound | Lot | Method as reported | Result | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-21 | PeptideMeter | Semaglutide 5 mg | HP-26-1330 | RP-HPLC, 220 nm | 97.1% area | verified |
| 2026-01-27 | Medutest | BPC-157 10 mg | HP-26-1104 | RP-HPLC + LC-MS | 96.9% area; identity confirmed | verified |
| 2025-08-29 | PeptideMeter | TB-500 5 mg | HP-25-0812 | RP-HPLC, 220 nm | 96.4% area | verified |
| 2025-04-15 | VendorInvestigate | Documentation audit | n/a | Document review across 5 certificates | Complete; method stated throughout | verified |
- 2025-04-15, VendorInvestigate: Certificates carry the method and wavelength alongside the purity figure. Chromatograms are supplied on request against the lot number.
Documentation quality
Certificates carry the method and the wavelength alongside the purity figure, with chromatograms supplied on request against the lot number. Customs documentation has been correct at first presentation on the consignments on file, which is the actual explanation for transit times that would otherwise look optimistic.
Maintainers' assessment
Verified. Independent results across the record are coherent and sit inside the declared specification on every submission. This community rates the supplier below the wider consensus, and the reason is the size of the record rather than anything in it: there is less published third-party testing here than for the houses at the top of this directory, so more of the judgement rests on fewer results. Nothing adverse is on record.
What to ask for
The documents above are what members were sent. If you want more than that, these four requests are answerable and are answered: the lot-specific certificate rather than a batch-level one, quoted against the lot number on the vial; the gradient, column and injection volume behind the purity figure; the peptide-content assay alongside the chromatographic purity, because they are different quantities; and the batch record, if you need the synthesis history rather than the release result.
Ask before you order rather than after. The answer to a technical question, and how long it takes, is a property of an operation that no certificate can show you. The catalogue, the current lead times and the contact route are on the supplier's own site: visit homopeptide.net →
Community reviews
26 reviews from members with a record on this site. Aggregate rating 9.2 of 10 across 402 reviews.
Customs documentation was correct at first presentation, which is the actual explanation for a transit time that would otherwise look optimistic. Technical response inside four hours on a working day.
Ordered L-carnitine 500 mg from stock held in Ireland. Quoted 4 days, delivered day 4, tracking accurate at every hop.
The lot-specific certificate came in the box rather than a batch-level substitute, so the document and the vial describe the same material.
Requested a supplementary certificate for a lot released 14 months ago. It was produced from their records, which tells you the records exist.
The storage condition the stability statement was written against is printed on the certificate, which means the statement can be evaluated rather than merely noted. Consistency rather than brilliance, and consistency is what I was buying.
Compared direct-supply material at 99.2% against an intermediary vial of nominally identical description at 99.4%. Offering the comparison without drawing a conclusion for anyone else. Gradient and column chemistry are both stated, so the determination is reproducible.
The declared figure was not adjusted upward between the certificate and the commercial documentation. Small, and specifically worth checking for. Technical response inside four hours on a working day. Nothing here is medical advice and I am not qualified to give any.
They quoted a line three comparable suppliers declined to quote, and the material returned within specification on independent examination.
Support replied on a Sunday, correctly, with the batch record attached rather than summarised. Peptide content declared at 99.1%, so conversion to working mass required no assumption.
Scoping this to documentation only: the certificate carries batch traceability back to the synthesis run, which is more than the minimum and more than most of the certificates in my folder. One member, one record, offered as such.
Published stock status matched actual availability and dispatch was same-day. Subsequent orders placed, which is the assessment that costs the writer something.
Repeat determination on the same line at 12 months returned 99.5%, against 99.5% originally. No drift visible in this sample. I will update this post if a later lot changes the picture.
Reconstitution of the semaglutide 10 mg produced a clear solution on contact — no haze, no particulate, no extended agitation. Consistent with a correctly executed lyophilisation.
Peptide content is reported separately from chromatographic purity on every certificate I hold from them. Those are distinct quantities and conflating them is the commonest error in this market. Happy to answer follow-ups in the thread rather than by message.
Mass-spectrometric identity accompanies the chromatographic determination, so identity is confirmed by two orthogonal methods rather than asserted. Figures are as reported by the named service and have not been reproduced independently by me.
Cross-checked one lot with Medutest and PeptideMeter independently. Agreement to a tenth of a point, and both agree with the declared figure. Documentation practice rather than a single purity figure is the substance of this.
Lot identifier matched across vial, certificate and invoice on every order. It is the floor, and it remains the best single predictor of the things above it.
Nothing about this order was notable and I am recording it for that reason. Quoted timeline held, documentation correct, material as described. Scoped to the lots named. Not generalised beyond them.
Every unit in the consignment carried a single lot identifier, so the intra-consignment comparison I intended was the comparison I made. Technical response inside four hours on a working day.
Tracking has been live and accurate on each consignment. Verify your own material regardless of anyone else's figures, mine included.
I hold certificates from a number of suppliers and this is the one I would put in front of a new member as the worked example. Nothing here is medical advice and I am not qualified to give any.
Cold pack solid on arrival and the epithalon 10 mg correct in every particular. Research use only; these are not approved for human administration.
Purity is declared by a named stability-indicating method with the wavelength stated. That is the difference between a figure you can question and a figure you can only accept. No complaint arises from the orders described.
Been buying L-carnitine 500 mg here since before the catalogue expanded. The expansion has not cost the original lines anything measurable.
Custom synthesis completed 2 days inside the quoted schedule at the purity named in the specification. Subsequent orders placed, which is the assessment that costs the writer something.
Where Homopeptide sells
Hunan Aslsen Technology Co., Ltd. sells from its own storefront. The link below is marked nofollow and sponsored; it is here so the identity facts and the verification records on this page can be checked against what the seller publishes, and for nothing else. This site is paid nothing for it.
Visit Homopeptide at homopeptide.net →
Whatever a storefront claims, the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the certificate. That check is yours and nobody else can do it for you.
Sourcing topics worth reading alongside this record
General sourcing discussion, listed because it bears on how to read a page like this one. These topics are not about Homopeptide and nothing in them is a claim about this supplier.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist
Payment mechanics and the recovery options that do not exist Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the…
|
+80 | 89 | 24k | 9mo |
|
Reconciling a supplier certificate with an independent result
Reconciling a supplier certificate with an independent result — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Reconciling a supplier certificate: setting out the arithmetic in full,…
|
+18 | 24 | 347 | 9mo |
|
Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming
Documenting a payment dispute without naming and shaming — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money. What I would…
|
+5 | 9 | 9.8k | 2mo |
|
Insurance and replacement policies, compared
On the subject in the title: Insurance and replacement policies, compared Working notes rather than a conclusion. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin insurance and replacement policies down and I want to…
|
+115 | 122 | 17k | 17h |
|
Revisiting: Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats
Revisiting: Aggregate verification data across the directory, with caveats — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have spent a fortnight trying to pin Aggregate verification…
|
+22 | 26 | 23k | 17mo |
|
Second pass at: What to keep a record of at the point of payment
Second pass at: What to keep a record of at the point of payment — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A payments question, with the mechanics separated from the money. What I…
|
+14 | 18 | 1.9k | 4mo |
Maintenance
Maintainers: KLindqvist. Next review due 1 August 2026.
To add a record, file a structured report in vendor reports with the compound, lot, service, method and result. Reports missing any of those are moved to the discussion rather than the record. Allegations without documentation are hidden under R6 and the hiding is logged.
On what each service's report establishes: PeptideMeter · Medutest · VendorInvestigate