The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Compounds · Cagrilintide & amylin analogues · continued

Amylin analogue mechanism: satiety signalling separate from GLP-1 posts 31–60

This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.

ME
m.ekstromTL2 Moderator5 Dec 2024 · edited#31
r.erdogan, post #19: This follows post #16 rather than contradicting it. I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am… Go to post

Is synergy the right word for the combination data? A phase 2 trial cannot establish whether effects are synergistic or additive. Synergy is a mechanistic claim that requires a designed experiment to support it. The combination works, but the mechanism is unsettled.

15 likes in reply to #19 20mo
LP
l.piresTL2 Moderator7 Dec 2024#32

On post #28 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.

The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.

30 likes 20mo
HM
h.mensahTL2 Moderator9 Dec 2024#33

What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism: real-world response rates, whether effect is durable with continued use, whether satiety adaptation occurs over months or years, safety profile in populations not enrolled in the trials.

1 like 20mo
BD
b.demirTL2 Moderator11 Dec 2024#34

Nausea profile of amylin analogues: the historical agent pramlintide required multiple daily doses and had a difficult tolerability profile. A weekly formulation is a substantially different proposition and data from that is more relevant than data from pramlintide.

5 likes 20mo
FC
f.chowdhuryTL2 Moderator14 Dec 2024#35
bench_notes, post #18: On post #14 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. The dosing interval: cagrilintide's half-life is roughly 7 to 8 days, suitable for weekly dosing. The pharmacokinetics are the reason the dosing schedule makes sense. Go to post

Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.

21 likes in reply to #18 19mo
T
ThibodeauTL3Regular16 Dec 2024#36
compounding_ruth, post #27: Amylin signalling is distinct from GLP-1 signalling. Amylin slows gastric emptying and promotes satiety through a different receptor and different neural pathways. The hypothesis behind combination is two complementary satiety mechanisms with one injection. Go to post

Amylin signalling is distinct from GLP-1 signalling. Amylin slows gastric emptying and promotes satiety through a different receptor and different neural pathways. The hypothesis behind combination is two complementary satiety mechanisms with one injection.

0 likes in reply to #27 19mo
HA
h.amankwahTL2 Moderator18 Dec 2024#37

This follows post #34 rather than contradicting it.

Historical amylin analogues: pramlintide was the only long-acting amylin analogue licensed for some time and its poor adherence was a known limitation. A weekly formulation addresses that practical barrier.

2 likes 19mo
ME
m.eriksenTL2 Moderator20 Dec 2024#38

Reading the phase 2 paper: it establishes tolerability and efficacy in a selected population on a defined dose escalation. It does not establish the lowest effective dose or the durability over years.

9 likes 19mo
HR
h.ramosTL2 Moderator22 Dec 2024#39

post #38 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Gastric emptying: both amylin and GLP-1 slow it, through partly overlapping but distinct mechanisms. Whether the slowing at a higher magnitude produces disproportionate nausea or is tolerable is a question phase 3 exists to answer.

6 likes 19mo
C
CSagredoTL3Regular24 Dec 2024 · edited#40
r.aldana_pharmd, post #16: The CagriSema phase 2 paper: a fixed combination of the two components in one weekly injection. The trade-off of a fixed combination is that you cannot titrate the components independently and you cannot attribute effect to one component from a combination trial. Go to post

The dosing interval: cagrilintide's half-life is roughly 7 to 8 days, suitable for weekly dosing. The pharmacokinetics are the reason the dosing schedule makes sense.

16 likes in reply to #16 19mo
CB
c.balogunTL2 Moderator27 Dec 2024#41
va.baptista, post #30: This follows post #27 rather than contradicting it. Cagrilintide alone is discussed less than in combination because the published data is almost entirely from combination trials. The phase 2 combination data was consistent with more effect than either component alone, but phase 2 cannot establish whether that is synergy or simply… Go to post

On post #37 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.

Is synergy the right word for the combination data? A phase 2 trial cannot establish whether effects are synergistic or additive. Synergy is a mechanistic claim that requires a designed experiment to support it. The combination works, but the mechanism is unsettled.

23 likes in reply to #30 19mo
L
LeitermanTL3Regular29 Dec 2024#42

post #41 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Cagrilintide molecular characteristics: it is a synthetic amylin analogue, substituted to prevent the amyloidogenicity of human amylin. The sequence is short and analytically straightforward to confirm by LC-MS.

10 likes 19mo
KO
k.okaforTL2 Moderator31 Dec 2024#43

For anyone arriving from searches on "amylin agonist": this subcategory discusses published clinical evidence and what it does and does not establish. It does not endorse or recommend the compounds discussed.

3 likes 19mo
KF
k.farrugiaTL3Regular2 Jan 2025#44
c.balogun, post #41: On post #37 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification. Is synergy the right word for the combination data? A phase 2 trial cannot establish whether effects are synergistic or additive. Synergy is a mechanistic claim that requires a designed experiment to support it. The combination works, but the mechanism is unsettled. Go to post

Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.

0 likes in reply to #41 19mo
NS
ni.stanescuTL2 Moderator4 Jan 2025 · edited#45
j.asante, post #28: For anyone arriving from searches on "amylin agonist": this subcategory discusses published clinical evidence and what it does and does not establish. It does not endorse or recommend the compounds discussed. Go to post

Cagrilintide alone is discussed less than in combination because the published data is almost entirely from combination trials. The phase 2 combination data was consistent with more effect than either component alone, but phase 2 cannot establish whether that is synergy or simply additivity.

16 likes in reply to #28 19mo
JH
j.habermannTL3Regular6 Jan 2025#46

post #45 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.

The CagriSema phase 2 paper: a fixed combination of the two components in one weekly injection. The trade-off of a fixed combination is that you cannot titrate the components independently and you cannot attribute effect to one component from a combination trial.

6 likes 19mo
AP
a.petrovTL2 Moderator8 Jan 2025#47

I read post #45 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.

Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.

The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.

1 like 19mo
AR
ambient_reviewTL3Regular10 Jan 2025#48

Cagrilintide alone is discussed less than in combination because the published data is almost entirely from combination trials. The phase 2 combination data was consistent with more effect than either component alone, but phase 2 cannot establish whether that is synergy or simply additivity.

0 likes 19mo
MR
m.ramosTL2 Moderator12 Jan 2025#49

Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.

11 likes 18mo
CR
curious_readerTL1Member14 Jan 2025#50

Gastric emptying: both amylin and GLP-1 slow it, through partly overlapping but distinct mechanisms. Whether the slowing at a higher magnitude produces disproportionate nausea or is tolerable is a question phase 3 exists to answer.

3 likes 18mo
SK
s.kuuselaTL2 Moderator16 Jan 2025 · edited#51
r.erdogan, post #19: This follows post #16 rather than contradicting it. I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological. The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am… Go to post

Picking up post #48: that is the part I would want checked first.

The CagriSema phase 2 paper: a fixed combination of the two components in one weekly injection. The trade-off of a fixed combination is that you cannot titrate the components independently and you cannot attribute effect to one component from a combination trial.

33 likes in reply to #19 18mo
TY
two_year_lineTL3Regular18 Jan 2025#52

Coming back to post #50, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

The dosing interval: cagrilintide's half-life is roughly 7 to 8 days, suitable for weekly dosing. The pharmacokinetics are the reason the dosing schedule makes sense.

0 likes 18mo
JI
j.iyerTL2 Moderator20 Jan 2025#53

What is genuinely unknown about long-term amylin agonism: real-world response rates, whether effect is durable with continued use, whether satiety adaptation occurs over months or years, safety profile in populations not enrolled in the trials.

3 likes 18mo
CL
coldchain_liuTL3Regular22 Jan 2025#54

Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.

11 likes 18mo
NO
n.oseiTL2 Moderator24 Jan 2025#55
h.delgado, post #26: Picking up post #23: that is the part I would want checked first. Historical amylin analogues: pramlintide was the only long-acting amylin analogue licensed for some time and its poor adherence was a known limitation. A weekly formulation addresses that practical barrier. Go to post

This follows post #52 rather than contradicting it.

Historical amylin analogues: pramlintide was the only long-acting amylin analogue licensed for some time and its poor adherence was a known limitation. A weekly formulation addresses that practical barrier.

24 likes in reply to #26 18mo
PM
physio_marchettiTL226 Jan 2025#56
NK
n.krastevTL2 Moderator28 Jan 2025#57

For anyone arriving from searches on "amylin agonist": this subcategory discusses published clinical evidence and what it does and does not establish. It does not endorse or recommend the compounds discussed.

1 like 18mo
BD
baseline_driftTL2Analytical chemist30 Jan 2025#58

Amylin signalling is distinct from GLP-1 signalling. Amylin slows gastric emptying and promotes satiety through a different receptor and different neural pathways. The hypothesis behind combination is two complementary satiety mechanisms with one injection.

7 likes 18mo
NK
ni.kravchenkoTL2 Moderator1 Feb 2025#59
b.demir, post #34: Nausea profile of amylin analogues: the historical agent pramlintide required multiple daily doses and had a difficult tolerability profile. A weekly formulation is a substantially different proposition and data from that is more relevant than data from pramlintide. Go to post

Nausea profile of amylin analogues: the historical agent pramlintide required multiple daily doses and had a difficult tolerability profile. A weekly formulation is a substantially different proposition and data from that is more relevant than data from pramlintide.

18 likes in reply to #34 18mo
R
RodriguesTL3Regular3 Feb 2025 · edited#60
ambient_review, post #48: Cagrilintide alone is discussed less than in combination because the published data is almost entirely from combination trials. The phase 2 combination data was consistent with more effect than either component alone, but phase 2 cannot establish whether that is synergy or simply additivity. Go to post

Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.

0 likes in reply to #48 18mo