Follow-up: Recovery when intake is low: what to cut first posts 31–41
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
post #31 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Recovery: heavier training on a energy deficit and on a compound that slows gastric emptying requires attention to recovery (sleep, nutrition, stress). Recovery capacity declines with deficit, so training volume might need adjustment.
I read post #31 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Cardio and resistance: the interaction between energy-intense cardiovascular training and resistance training is real. Moderate cardio is fine; excessive endurance training can interfere with muscle maintenance.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to building again. The transition from preservation mode to building mode is real and worth planning.
Coming back to post #35, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Picking up post #35: that is the part I would want checked first.
Post-weight-loss training: once weight loss is complete and energy deficit ends, training can shift to building again. The transition from preservation mode to building mode is real and worth planning.
Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
Worth separating two things that post #35 runs together.
Programming while losing weight quickly: realistic expectations are crucial. Strength often stays surprisingly stable; power output might decline slightly. Expecting gains during an energy deficit sets yourself up for disappointment.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
post #40 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Cardio and resistance: the interaction between energy-intense cardiovascular training and resistance training is real. Moderate cardio is fine; excessive endurance training can interfere with muscle maintenance.
This topic was referenced in
- Recovery when intake is low: what to cut firstNutrition & Training › Resistance training · 91 replies
- Progressive overload when the scale is fallingNutrition & Training › Resistance training · 8 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold?
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Maintenance rather than loss,…
|
2 | 11k | 10mo | |
|
About the Resistance training category
Programming while losing weight quickly, realistic expectations, and recovery. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
|
4 | 40k | 17d | |
|
Programming during a large energy deficit
Programming during a large energy deficit — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…
|
+39 | 49 | 36k | 2d |
|
Training through a dose escalation week
Training through a dose escalation week — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes about. I have…
|
4 | 42k | 20mo | |
|
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports
On the subject in the title: Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method…
|
+27 | 31 | 22k | 20mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags DXA, lean mass loss, fatigue
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[2026 update] Distinguishing expected GI effects from something that needs urgent attention
On the subject in the title: Distinguishing expected GI effects from something that needs urgent attention Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reporting something rather than asking about it, in case the…
|
+10 | 14 | 11k | 4mo |
|
Second pass at: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate
Second pass at: Circumference measurements as a poor man's composition estimate — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a…
|
+64 | 68 | 13k | 4mo |
|
Reflux appearing for the first time at a dose step
Reflux appearing for the first time at a dose step — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A question about technique rather than about dose. I have been doing the same thing for…
|
4 | 36k | 4mo | |
|
Coming back to: Injection-site reactions: describing them precisely enough to be useful
On the subject in the title: Injection-site reactions: describing them precisely enough to be useful Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reporting something rather than asking about it, in case the…
|
+21 | 25 | 22k | 8mo |
|
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Maintenance rather than loss, which is the part of this that almost nobody writes…
|
+22 | 26 | 53k | 20h |