Collapsed as off-topic by two members at trust level 3 or above
No judgment: people come to this community from all backgrounds and with all motivations. Introductions are for getting to know each other, not for evaluation.
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
No judgment: people come to this community from all backgrounds and with all motivations. Introductions are for getting to know each other, not for evaluation.
This follows post #89 rather than contradicting it.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
What to include: your name or handle, how you found the community, what brings you here, maybe something about yourself that seems relevant (clinician, researcher, person using these compounds, curious). Anything you are comfortable sharing.
Community culture: introductions give you a sense of who is here. Reading a few introduces you to the people and the tone of the community.
Coming back to post #93, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Ongoing: you can post multiple introductions over time. If you return after a long break, reintroducing yourself is fine.
Welcome: the response to introductions is usually welcome. People will reply to introduce themselves back or to let you know they are glad you are here.
Lurking first: if you want to introduce yourself after lurking a bit, that is fine. You do not have to introduce yourself before your first technical post either.
I read post #97 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
Welcome: the response to introductions is usually welcome. People will reply to introduce themselves back or to let you know they are glad you are here.
Lurking first: if you want to introduce yourself after lurking a bit, that is fine. You do not have to introduce yourself before your first technical post either.
Say hello. No question required. Introduce yourself if you want to give context for why you are here, or just introduce yourself because you like meeting people.
post #101 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Community culture: introductions give you a sense of who is here. Reading a few introduces you to the people and the tone of the community.
No spam: introductions are not a place to advertise commercial products or services. That is a rules violation.
Ongoing: you can post multiple introductions over time. If you return after a long break, reintroducing yourself is fine.
Privacy: share only what you are comfortable making permanent and public. An introduction is archived and searchable; do not include information you will later regret posting.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
Coming back to post #105, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
No judgment: people come to this community from all backgrounds and with all motivations. Introductions are for getting to know each other, not for evaluation.
What to include: your name or handle, how you found the community, what brings you here, maybe something about yourself that seems relevant (clinician, researcher, person using these compounds, curious). Anything you are comfortable sharing.
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+2 | 6 | 10k | 15mo |
|
[2026 update] Long-time reader, first-time poster
Long-time reader, first-time poster — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something adjacent…
|
+46 | 50 | 23k | 5mo |
|
Here for the analytics and not much else
Here for the analytics and not much else — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim. Something…
|
+93 | 102 | 10k | 16h |
|
Joined after a search result and stayed
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Joined after a search result and stayed Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+5 | 9 | 26k | 7h |
|
About the Introductions category
Say hello. No question required. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note. If the scope described here has drifted…
|
4 | 2.3k | 23mo |
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Titles that describe the question, not the situation — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. Question in the title. Context below, and I…
|
+29 | 33 | 29k | 10mo |
|
About the Welcome category
Introductions, orientation, and the pinned reading list for new members. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a note.…
|
+4 | 8 | 11k | 27d |
|
Follow-up: The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for
On the subject in the title: The most useful thing you learned here that was not the answer you came for Working notes rather than a conclusion. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if…
|
+30 | 34 | 9.7k | 11h |
|
Coming back to: How to tell whether your question is already answered on a maintained page
How to tell whether your question is already answered on a maintained page I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Question in the title. Context below, and I…
|
2 | 808 | 17mo | |
|
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides
Hello from a laboratory that does not do peptides — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if anyone makes a claim.…
|
+2 | 6 | 10k | 15mo |