The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Second pass at: Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind

This is a generated summary. It shows the 6 most-liked posts from a topic of 45, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
ST
sterile_tableTL3Regular16 May 2025#3

Coming back to the opening post, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.

Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.

29 likes 14mo
GB
g.bakkenTL2 Moderator Solution16 May 2025#4

Picking up post #2: that is the part I would want checked first.

Washout periods: after stopping a medication, how long does it take for the effect to wash out? For compounds with a week-long half-life, roughly a month is needed to reach baseline. Using that washout period in a before-after design strengthens the inference.

14 likes 14mo
SK
s.kuuselaTL2 Moderator17 May 2025#13

Statistical analysis of n-of-1 data: comparing before versus after with a t-test or similar is one approach. Plotting the data visually is another. Both are valid.

27 likes 14mo
PN
p.novotnyTL2Regular19 May 2025#24

Confounding in personal experiments: other things change when you start a medication (season, exercise, diet, stress). Documenting those confounders helps you understand their contribution to the result.

30 likes 14mo
EV
e.verhoevenTL2 Moderator20 May 2025#32

Confounding in personal experiments: other things change when you start a medication (season, exercise, diet, stress). Documenting those confounders helps you understand their contribution to the result.

32 likes 14mo
O
OstrowskiTL2Member21 May 2025#39
j.ivaturi, post #2: Stopping rules: decide in advance when you will stop measuring (after a defined duration, after a defined number of measurements, or after a defined condition is met). Not deciding in advance means stopping when the result satisfies you, which is bias. Go to post

Objective versus subjective measures: subjective measures (how you feel) are vulnerable to bias. Objective measures (weight, strength on a specific exercise) are less vulnerable but not immune.

30 likes in reply to #2 14mo

Read the full topic (45 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset
On the subject in the title: An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations — a second dataset Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before…
VELIGRAC+106 118 25k 4mo
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine
Why most self-reports here are not experiments, and that is fine — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) cited in…
SBSKGF 2 46k 11mo
Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind — one year on
Designing a personal experiment that could change your mind — one year on — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Session topic: STEP 4 ( JAMA , 2021). Please read it before…
TKNMPMBSMC+74 80 17k 2d
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic
Washout with a one-week half-life: the arithmetic — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. I have seen LEADER ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim I do not think it…
SKTPBLCSF+90 96 44k 20mo
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations
An ABAB design with a data table and honest limitations Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Session topic: SURPASS-4 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before…
SSDSEF 2 45k 5mo

Related topics — sharing the tags worked example, effect size, confounding

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Coming back to: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide
On the subject in the title: Column chemistry choices for a 40-residue peptide Working notes rather than a conclusion. Posting the method first, because I know what the first three replies will otherwise be.…
MLFPHB 2 43k 16mo
[2026 update] Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here
On the subject in the title: Reporting a disappointing outcome, and why it belongs here Working notes rather than a conclusion. Longitudinal report with the method stated, because a number without a method is…
KRSRCB 2 11k 8mo
How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work
How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) cited in support of a…
DVDHKTFWV+112 119 1.3k 2y
Revisiting: List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay
Revisiting: List price versus negotiated price versus what you pay — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. A coverage question with the paperwork detail included, since that is…
VKBVIABDGR+24 28 50k 12mo
Follow-up: Why the titration planner refuses to produce a schedule below a floor
The question in the title: Why the titration planner refuses to produce a schedule below a floor I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I would like to understand what this number…
COCKHCNRM+120 146 14k 10mo