Topic summary

When a preprint is the best available evidence and we say so — a second dataset

Evidence › Preprints preprint risk of bias needs a source Solved

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 25, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.

s.dziedzicTL2 Moderator Solution7 Oct 2024#3

w.moreau, post #1: When a preprint is the best available evidence and we say so — a second dataset I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. I have seen SUSTAIN 6 ( N Engl J Med , 2016) cited in support of a claim I do not think it supports, twice this month, so I would like to work through what it actually… Go to post

Unrefereed work is not worthless. A great deal of it survives review substantially unchanged. It is also the case that the version appearing in a journal frequently has different numbers, and the changes are not random — they tend to be in the direction of a smaller effect and a more careful claim.

7 likes in reply to #1 22mo

c.adebayoTL2 Moderator23 Oct 2024#4

Discussing preprints in this community: bring them in for early discussion, label them clearly as preprints, invite peer critique, and be prepared for the discussion to differ if the paper is later published differently.

17 likes 21mo

j.asanteTL2 Moderator2 Dec 2024 · edited#7

Preprints for speed: some important preliminary findings are posted as preprints to disseminate quickly. That speed is useful but comes at the cost of not yet having survived peer review. The trade-off is real.

25 likes 20mo

a.salcedoTL3Regular21 Feb 2025#14

va.baptista, post #5: Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive. Go to post

Server repositories: medRxiv for medicine, bioRxiv for biology. Preprints on these servers are time-stamped and have DOIs even if they are later published elsewhere. Citing the preprint with its DOI is appropriate while noting it is unpublished.

24 likes in reply to #5 17mo

h.koodziejTL2Member13 May 2025#22

32 likes 15mo

Read the full topic (25 posts)

This topic was referenced in

Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best partEvidence › Preprints · 42 replies

Suggested topics

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Coming back to: Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part Evidence › Preprints risk of bias effect size preprint Under review Why a preprint's supplementary material is often the best part — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with STEP 4 (…	+109	116	36k	2d
How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work Evidence › Preprints risk of bias effect size preprint needs a source How this community labels and discusses unrefereed work — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. I have seen SCALE ( N Engl J Med , 2015) cited in support of a…	+112	119	1.3k	2y
Tracking a preprint to publication: a worked example — the long version Evidence › Preprints risk of bias preprint effect size Posting this under the heading it deserves: Tracking a preprint to publication: a worked example — the long version Everything below is what sits behind that. Comparing STEP 8 ( JAMA , 2022) with STEP 2 (…	+38	47	560	22mo
Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation Evidence › Preprints risk of bias effect size needs a source On the subject in the title: Conference abstracts as evidence: the weakest common citation Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: SURMOUNT-1 ( N Engl J Med , 2022). Please read it before…	+1	5	2k	9mo
About the Preprints category Evidence › Preprints preprint risk of bias needs a source Pinned Wiki Unrefereed work, clearly labelled as such, with the usual caveats stated once and taken seriously. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded…	+3	7	14k	3mo

Related topics — sharing the tags preprint, risk of bias, needs a source

Topic	Participants	Replies	Views	Activity
Journal club: FLOW and the renal composite, component by component Evidence › Journal club randomised trial estimand risk of bias On the subject in the title: Journal club: FLOW and the renal composite, component by component Working notes rather than a conclusion. Session topic: STEP 2 ( Lancet , 2021). Please read it before posting;…	+84	91	18k	2y
BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold? Compounds › Repair & healing peptides observational data needs a source BPC-157 TB-500 Solved The question in the title: BPC-157: what the rodent literature actually shows, and what it does not — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. I have seen…	+6	10	3.1k	1d
Journal club: PIONEER 6 as a safety trial Evidence › Journal club effect size journal club number needed to treat risk of bias Posting this under the heading it deserves: Journal club: PIONEER 6 as a safety trial Everything below is what sits behind that. Session topic: SURMOUNT-4 ( JAMA , 2024). Please read it before posting; the…	+14	18	262	5mo
Delayed gastric emptying and oral medication absorption: which drugs matter Practice › Interactions metformin needs a source hypoglycaemia Solved Wiki On the subject in the title: Delayed gastric emptying and oral medication absorption: which drugs matter Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reporting something rather than asking about it, in case the…	+110	116	43k	14mo
[2026 update] Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint? Evidence › Journal club effect size risk of bias randomised trial Journal club: is percentage weight change the right endpoint? — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Comparing SURPASS-2 ( N Engl J Med , 2021) with…	+105	118	18k	11mo