When to stop reading forums, including this one posts 61–87
This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1.
Coming back to post #61, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Sleep and mental health: these compounds can affect sleep for some people. Sleep deprivation worsens mood and anxiety. Addressing sleep separately from mood matters.
Picking up post #61: that is the part I would want checked first.
Sleep and mental health: these compounds can affect sleep for some people. Sleep deprivation worsens mood and anxiety. Addressing sleep separately from mood matters.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
post #65 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Body image and weight loss: large weight loss changes a person's relationship with their body in ways that can be psychologically complex. Some of that is positive; some might involve adjustment or processing.
I read post #65 twice before replying, because I had assumed the opposite.
When to involve a professional: if mood changes are persistent, deepen over weeks, or interfere with function, involving a mental health professional is appropriate. These are not trivialities to ignore.
Disordered eating history: a history of anorexia, bulimia, or other eating disorders changes the risk-benefit calculation. Appetite suppression might trigger relapse. Specialist input is prudent.
Identity and self-image: for some people, weight and body size are central to identity. Large change to body size can affect identity. This is not pathological; it is human.
Motivation and expectation: starting with clear motivation and realistic expectations about what will happen and when helps with psychological adjustment.
Practical note that does not fit anywhere else. Whatever you conclude from this topic, write down what you did and when. The single most useful thing in your own records is not any individual result; it is that they are dated and consecutive.
Substance use: if someone has a history of substance use, appetite suppression and weight loss can shift thinking about body and substance use. This is a risk factor worth acknowledging.
On post #70 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Support and community: some people process weight change through community (online or in-person). Others prefer privacy. Knowing what you need and seeking it proactively helps.
This follows post #72 rather than contradicting it.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
Mood and anxiety: mood changes and anxiety are reported by some people. Baseline mental health status matters for risk. Someone with a history of depression should plan closer monitoring.
Sleep and mental health: these compounds can affect sleep for some people. Sleep deprivation worsens mood and anxiety. Addressing sleep separately from mood matters.
Substance use: if someone has a history of substance use, appetite suppression and weight loss can shift thinking about body and substance use. This is a risk factor worth acknowledging.
Support and community: some people process weight change through community (online or in-person). Others prefer privacy. Knowing what you need and seeking it proactively helps.
Coming back to post #78, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Mood and anxiety: mood changes and anxiety are reported by some people. Baseline mental health status matters for risk. Someone with a history of depression should plan closer monitoring.
When to involve a professional: if mood changes are persistent, deepen over weeks, or interfere with function, involving a mental health professional is appropriate. These are not trivialities to ignore.
I disagree with the reply above, and I think the disagreement is substantive rather than terminological.
The distinction being drawn does not survive when you look at the published data for this specific question. I would be glad to be shown wrong on this, because the version I am arguing against is more convenient.
post #83 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Body image and weight loss: large weight loss changes a person's relationship with their body in ways that can be psychologically complex. Some of that is positive; some might involve adjustment or processing.
On post #83 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Disordered eating history: a history of anorexia, bulimia, or other eating disorders changes the risk-benefit calculation. Appetite suppression might trigger relapse. Specialist input is prudent.
This topic was referenced in
- Mood changes: monitoring, and when to involve a professionalWellbeing › Mental health · 2 replies
Suggested topics
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
About the Mental health category
Mood, anxiety, disordered eating history, and knowing when to involve a professional. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its…
|
+4 | 8 | 34k | 9mo |
|
Talking to a therapist about this specifically — does this still hold?
The question in the title: Talking to a therapist about this specifically — does this still hold? I will give what I have already checked below so nobody repeats it. Asking about a population rather than…
|
+59 | 65 | 13k | 14mo |
|
Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow Everything below is what sits behind that. General question, not a request for advice about my own care —…
|
+40 | 45 | 8.9k | 20mo |
|
A history of disordered eating: proceeding carefully
A history of disordered eating: proceeding carefully Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The published…
|
+70 | 75 | 10k | 6mo |
|
Second pass at: Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow
Second pass at: Food noise reducing and the disorientation that can follow — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. Asking about a population rather than about a person. The…
|
+55 | 59 | 965 | 21mo |
Related topics — sharing the tags mood, disordered eating, beginner friendly
| Topic | Participants | Replies | Views | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What to include when your question involves a laboratory result — a second dataset
What to include when your question involves a laboratory result — a second dataset I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Question in the title. Context…
|
2 | 7k | 23d | |
|
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant
Introducing myself: pharmacist, sceptic, reluctant participant Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if…
|
+13 | 17 | 23k | 2mo |
|
Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose
On the subject in the title: Renal impairment: what the labelling says about dose Working notes rather than a conclusion. General question, not a request for advice about my own care — I know the difference…
|
4 | 8.9k | 19mo | |
|
What other technical communities get right that we do not
What other technical communities get right that we do not — that is the question, and I have not found it answered plainly anywhere I have looked. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if…
|
+2 | 6 | 23k | 5h |
|
Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Revisiting: The best-written scientific paper you have read Everything below is what sits behind that. Lower-stakes topic, but the sourcing rule still applies if…
|
+102 | 121 | 21k | 1h |