This is a continuation of a long topic, addressed by post number rather than by page. Start at post 1 · go to the accepted answer.
Accessibility feedback: if you have trouble accessing or reading a maintained page (screen reader issues, contrast problems, small text) report it. Accessibility matters.
Format suggestions: if you think a maintained page could be clearer in its presentation (different section structure, different examples, added graphics) suggest the change.
post #33 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Correction requests: if you spot an error in a maintained page, note it here with the specific correction. The maintainer will review and update if justified.
Coming back to post #33, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Flag a page that has drifted: if you notice a maintained page has information that is outdated (dates that have passed, regulatory changes, new evidence) post a flag so the maintainers see it.
Thank you for the correction. I have edited my earlier post with a note rather than silently, so the thread still makes sense to read. The error was mine and it was the kind that comes from remembering a figure instead of looking it up.
Scope creep: if you think a page is attempting too much and should be split into multiple pages, that is a reasonable suggestion.
Scope creep: if you think a page is attempting too much and should be split into multiple pages, that is a reasonable suggestion.
Cross-referencing: if you notice two pages that should reference each other but do not, suggest the cross-reference.
Picking up post #38: that is the part I would want checked first.
Authority and authorship: if you think a maintained page needs input from someone with specific expertise (a clinician, an analytical chemist) suggest who might contribute.
Format suggestions: if you think a maintained page could be clearer in its presentation (different section structure, different examples, added graphics) suggest the change.
Correction requests: if you spot an error in a maintained page, note it here with the specific correction. The maintainer will review and update if justified.
Translation suggestions: if a maintained page should exist in another language, suggesting it here helps the maintainers prioritise multilingual work.
Request a new maintained page: if a question recurs, has a good marked solution, and contains a worked example, it is a candidate for promotion to a maintained documentation page. Post your nomination in this subcategory with a link to the topic.
Coming back to post #48, because the follow-up matters more than the original answer.
Flag a page that has drifted: if you notice a maintained page has information that is outdated (dates that have passed, regulatory changes, new evidence) post a flag so the maintainers see it.
On post #47 — agreed on the reasoning, with one qualification.
Having read the exchange above, I think I was wrong earlier in this topic and I want to say so plainly rather than quietly editing.
The correction was fair and I had been repeating something I had not checked carefully enough.
Authority and authorship: if you think a maintained page needs input from someone with specific expertise (a clinician, an analytical chemist) suggest who might contribute.
Suggesting content for a page: if you know a maintained page is missing something important, post a suggestion with specific content you think should be added.
Worth separating two things that post #51 runs together.
Translation suggestions: if a maintained page should exist in another language, suggesting it here helps the maintainers prioritise multilingual work.
post #55 is right about the mechanism and I think understates the practical bit.
Correction requests: if you spot an error in a maintained page, note it here with the specific correction. The maintainer will review and update if justified.
Format suggestions: if you think a maintained page could be clearer in its presentation (different section structure, different examples, added graphics) suggest the change.
Scope creep: if you think a page is attempting too much and should be split into multiple pages, that is a reasonable suggestion.
Cross-referencing: if you notice two pages that should reference each other but do not, suggest the cross-reference.