The Peptide CommonsEst. May 2024
Independent. We sell nothing and are affiliated with no manufacturer or pharmacy. Every moderation action is logged in public
Topic summary

Progressive overload when the scale is falling

This is a generated summary. It shows the 5 most-liked posts from a topic of 9, in their original order, with the accepted answer included where one exists. It is a reading aid and it will miss nuance — the full topic is the record.
GL
glossary_lineTL1Member2 Mar 2025#1

Posting this under the heading it deserves: Progressive overload when the scale is falling Everything below is what sits behind that.

Trying to establish the boundary conditions on progressive overload. The general claim is fine; I want to know where it stops holding, because that is where I am operating.

Three edge cases below, in increasing order of how far outside the usual range they sit.

12 likes 17mo
IW
i.wojcikTL223 Apr 2025#2

A request rather than an answer: could whoever has the primary source for progressive overload post it? I have seen the claim three times this month and each version had lost a qualifier.

16 likes 15mo
CO
c.okaforTL3Regular3 Aug 2025#5
bench_entry, post #3: Anybody returning after a break should expect to start lower than they left, and expecting otherwise is where injuries come from. It is a small point and it changes the answer, which is an awkward combination. Go to post

Post #3 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different.

Two claims get bundled together under progressive overload and they need separating. The descriptive one — this is what was observed — is usually well supported. The causal one — this is why — usually is not.

Almost every disagreement in threads like this one dissolves once you say which of the two you are making.

10 likes in reply to #3 12mo
KA
k.asanteTL21 Sep 2025 · edited#6
c.okafor, post #5: Post #3 answers the question as asked. The question underneath it is different. Two claims get bundled together under progressive overload and they need separating. The descriptive one — this is what was observed — is usually well supported. The causal one — this is why — usually is not. Almost every disagreement in threads like this… Go to post

I changed my mind about progressive overload after someone here asked me for the source and I could not produce one. That is worth saying out loud because it is the ordinary way it happens.

22 likes in reply to #5 11mo
ND
n.duarteTL226 Oct 2025#8

Nothing here is medical advice and anybody with a relevant condition should have a programme reviewed by somebody qualified rather than assembled from a forum.

Not the answer, but possibly the question that gets there.

3 likes 9mo

Read the full topic (9 posts)

Suggested topics

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on
Progressive overload when the scale is falling — one year on Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. The question about Progressive overload that I actually want…
ENLOPMDBJS+152 167 6.6k 21mo
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports
On the subject in the title: Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reporting rather than asking, and the method is stated so the numbers mean…
BKCKKKEL+27 31 22k 20mo
About the Resistance training category
Programming while losing weight quickly, realistic expectations, and recovery. This post is a community wiki: any member at trust level 3 or above can edit it, and every edit is recorded with its author and a…
SLKAICRJM 4 40k 17d
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold?
Realistic expectations for strength while losing weight quickly — does this still hold? I have a specific reason for asking rather than idle curiosity, and the context is below. Working notes on Realistic…
GFIBT 2 11k 10mo
Training through a dose escalation week
Training through a dose escalation week — setting out what I have, and where I think it stops being reliable. What changes if the standard account of training through a dose escalation is wrong? I ask because…
KJFYMHEST 4 42k 20mo

Related topics — sharing the tags fatigue, DXA, lean mass loss

TopicParticipantsRepliesViewsActivity
Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports
On the subject in the title: Two sessions a week versus four: what the evidence supports Working notes rather than a conclusion. Reporting rather than asking, and the method is stated so the numbers mean…
BKCKKKEL+27 31 22k 20mo
What I would record differently if I started again
Asking directly, because I could not find a straight answer: What I would record differently if I started again Asking about the phase almost nobody writes about. The material here on losing is good. The…
MICLVK 2 12k 5mo
Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale
Second pass at: Two scans six weeks apart on different machines: a cautionary tale Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. A question about measurement precision…
NLPNVOLBV+1 5 34k 8mo
Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since
Posting this under the heading it deserves: Ultrasound and skinfolds: operator dependence in practice — what changed since Everything below is what sits behind that. What changes if the standard account of…
BJAVTKPNRV+32 37 7.4k 3mo
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment
Shakes versus food: a pragmatic assessment Writing it up because I had to work it out twice and would rather nobody else did. I would like to know what people here actually do about shakes versus food, as…
DBPAKTSTM+22 26 53k 20h